Jonathan Pila

1.6k citations
36 papers · 716 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Pila

36 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers

Jonathan Pila
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Geometry and Topology 576
  • Algebra and Number Theory 202
  • Mathematical Physics 328
  • Theoretical Computer Science 30
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 75
Replace Robert Rumely with:
Robert Rumely United States
Attila Pethő Hungary
Marc Hindry France
Pietro Corvaja Italy
David Goss United States
Jan‐Hendrik Evertse Netherlands
Michael A. Bennett Canada
Gisbert Wüstholz Switzerland
David Masser Switzerland
Peter Shiu United Kingdom
Jonathan Pila relative to Robert Rumely United States Robert Rumely's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert Rumely · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Pila

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Pila's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Pila with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Pila more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Pila

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Pila. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Pila. The network helps show where Jonathan Pila may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Pila, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Pila Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Pila links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989149
2 200688
3 201158
4 199058
5 200846
6 200440
7 200923
8 199321
9 199120
10 201117
11 201416
12 201215
13 200813
14 200513
15 201913
16 201012
17 201612
18 200212
19 200911
20 201311

About Jonathan Pila

Jonathan Pila is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (18 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (9 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (8 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (7 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (7 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (4 papers) and Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (576 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (202 citations), Mathematical Physics (328 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (30 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (75 citations). Jonathan Pila has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Enrico Bombieri, A. J. Wilkie, Jacob Tsimerman, Umberto Zannier, H. W. Lenstra, Carl Pomerance, Ngaiming Mok, Daniel J. Bernstein and Fernando Rodríguez Villegas. Their work appears in journals such as Duke Mathematical Journal, Annals of Mathematics, Annales de l’institut Fourier, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies and The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact