Inti A. Brazil
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Berend H. BultenMiguel FariasArielle Baskin–SommersSylco S. HoppenbrouwersJoseph H. R. MaesEllen R. A. de BruijnUte KreplinRobbert J. Verkes
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (50 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (18 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsPsychological BulletinSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
Inti A. Brazil
78 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 553
- Social Psychology 481
- Sociology and Political Science 300
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 300
Countries citing papers authored by Inti A. Brazil
This map shows the geographic impact of Inti A. Brazil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inti A. Brazil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inti A. Brazil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inti A. Brazil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inti A. Brazil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inti A. Brazil. The network helps show where Inti A. Brazil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inti A. Brazil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inti A. Brazil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inti A. Brazil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inti A. Brazil. Inti A. Brazil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | De rol van fouten bij gedragsaanpassing in psychopathie | 0 |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | Psychological and cognitive benefits of yoga among UK prisoners | 1 |
| 20 | 28 |
About Inti A. Brazil
Inti A. Brazil is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (50 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (18 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (553 citations) and Social Psychology (481 citations). Inti A. Brazil has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Berend H. Bulten, Miguel Farias, Arielle Baskin–Sommers, Sylco S. Hoppenbrouwers, Joseph H. R. Maes, Ellen R. A. de Bruijn, Ute Kreplin, Robbert J. Verkes, Jan K. Buitelaar and Rogier B. Mars. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Psychological Bulletin and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.