Replace Journal of Social and Political Psychology with:
Journal of Social and Political PsychologyUnited States
Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyUnited States
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical PsychologyUnited States
Archive for the Psychology of ReligionUnited States
BioSocietiesUnited Kingdom
Journal of Cognition and CultureUnited States
Communication ReportsUnited States
TSQ Transgender Studies QuarterlySouth Sudan
New Zealand journal of psychologyNew Zealand
Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionUnited States
Journal of Social and Political PsychologyUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Religion Brain & Behavior
Religion Brain & Behavior · 1×
×1.83.7kSPS
×1.21.8kSP
×0.3372HEALT
×0.7524CN
×1.3614CP
Citations per year, relative to Religion Brain & Behavior
Religion Brain & Behavior · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Religion Brain & Behavior
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Religion Brain & Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Religion Brain & Behavior more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior
This network shows the impact of papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.