Jonathan Hearn

932 citations
45 papers · 409 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Hearn

40 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Jonathan Hearn
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Political Science and International Relations 150
  • Sociology and Political Science 261
  • Anthropology 44
  • Public Administration 15
  • History 42
Replace Kenan Malik with:
Kenan Malik
Satya P. Mohanty United States
Lesley Gill United States
Julie Hemment United States
Jeff Spinner‐Halev United States
T. K. Oommen India
Minoo Moallem United States
Robert Fine United Kingdom
Richard H. King United Kingdom
Noel Ignatiev United States
Jonathan Hearn relative to Kenan Malik Kenan Malik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Kenan Malik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Hearn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Hearn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Hearn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Hearn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Hearn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Hearn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Hearn. The network helps show where Jonathan Hearn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Hearn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Hearn Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Hearn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Rethinking Nationalism: A Critical Introduction
200649
2 200747
3 201242
4 201837
5 200635
6 201231
7
Sage Handbook of Political Sociology
201724
8 200119
9 199916
10 200813
11 20029
12 20148
13 20148
14
Renewing Democracy in Scotland: an educational sourcebook
20026
15 20166
16 20095
17 20154
18 20114
19 20184
20 20193

About Jonathan Hearn

Jonathan Hearn is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, History and Education, having authored 45 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (9 papers), Political Systems and Governance (7 papers), Irish and British Studies (7 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (3 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (150 citations), Sociology and Political Science (261 citations), Anthropology (44 citations), Public Administration (15 citations) and History (42 citations). Jonathan Hearn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Marco Antonsich, Haifei Zhang, Adham Ahmed, Pete Allison, Bernard Yack, Joep Leerssen, Chandran Kukathas, Douglas Cairns, Nathan Coombs and Peter W. Mathieson. Their work appears in journals such as Nations and Nationalism, Journal of Political Power, Sociological Research Online, Journal of Historical Sociology and Chinese Sociological Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact