Journal of Historical Sociology

730 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 730 papers published in Journal of Historical Sociology in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Historical Sociology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (455 papers), Political Science and International Relations (200 papers) and History (155 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (72 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (59 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Historical Sociology are Philip Abrams, Zoe Todd, Michael Kearney, Ana Alonso, Alastair Bonnett, Jonathan Hyslop, Adam Ashforth, Rolando Vázquez, Uri Ram and Antoinette Burton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Historical Sociology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Historical Sociology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Historical Sociology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Historical Sociology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Historical Sociology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Historical Sociology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Historical Sociology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025