Lesley Gill
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sharryn KasmirGerald M. SiderGavin SmithWinnie LemJaume FranquesaCatherine LutzMicaela di LeonardoLeigh Binford
- Topics
- Politics and Society in Latin America (6 papers)Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (4 papers)Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (4 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewEnvironment and Planning A Economy and SpaceAmerican Anthropologist
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Lesley Gill
34 papers receiving 323 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Sociology and Political Science 271
- Political Science and International Relations 150
- Anthropology 81
- General Health Professions 33
- Cultural Studies 30
Countries citing papers authored by Lesley Gill
This map shows the geographic impact of Lesley Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lesley Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lesley Gill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lesley Gill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lesley Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lesley Gill. The network helps show where Lesley Gill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lesley Gill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lesley Gill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lesley Gill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lesley Gill. Lesley Gill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | The Parastate in Colombia: Political Violence and the Restructuring of Barrancabermeja | 15 |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | The Tortured History of State Terror. Review of Alfred W. McCoy's A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation From the Cold War to the War on Terror (NY: Metropolitan Books, 2006) | 3 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 57 |
About Lesley Gill
Lesley Gill is a scholar working on Public Administration, Anthropology and Business and International Management, having authored 40 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (6 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (4 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (81 citations), Political Science and International Relations (150 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (271 citations). Lesley Gill has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sharryn Kasmir, Gerald M. Sider, Gavin Smith, Winnie Lem, Jaume Franquesa, Catherine Lutz, Micaela di Leonardo, Gavin Smith, Leigh Binford and Terence Turner. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and American Anthropologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.