Jonathan Goldberg
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- History top 0.1%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Stephen GreenblattGregory W. BredbeckNicholas F. RadelYoshio NozawaKatharine Eisaman MausJohn C. KoshyCharles N. S. SoparkarMargreta de Grazia
- Journals
- Shakespeare Quarterly (5 papers)MLN (4 papers)Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (4 papers)Criticism (4 papers)ELH (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Goldberg
61 papers receiving 658 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Literature and Literary Theory 376
- History 335
- Classics 100
- Museology 60
- Anthropology 128
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Goldberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Goldberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Goldberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Goldberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Goldberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Goldberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Goldberg. The network helps show where Jonathan Goldberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Goldberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 10 | John Milton : the major works | 2003 | 10 |
| 11 | 1997 | 7 | |
| 12 | Now That the Future Has Arrived, Maybe the Law Should Take a Look: Multimedia Technology and Its Interaction with the Fair Use Doctrine | 1995 | 2 |
| 13 | 1995 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 58 | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1969 | 24 |
About Jonathan Goldberg
Jonathan Goldberg is a scholar working on Music, History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory and Conservation, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (6 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (6 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (5 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (5 papers), Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (4 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (4 papers) and American Literature and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (376 citations), History (335 citations), Classics (100 citations), Museology (60 citations) and Anthropology (128 citations). Jonathan Goldberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Greenblatt, Gregory W. Bredbeck, Nicholas F. Radel, Yoshio Nozawa, Katharine Eisaman Maus, John C. Koshy, Charles N. S. Soparkar, Margreta de Grazia, Gordon Teskey and Madhavi Menon. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, MLN, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Criticism and ELH.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.