Jonathan D. Stanley

933 total citations
20 papers, 611 citations indexed

About

Jonathan D. Stanley is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan D. Stanley has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 611 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Accounting, 3 papers in Strategy and Management and 3 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Jonathan D. Stanley's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (14 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (3 papers). Jonathan D. Stanley is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (14 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (3 papers). Jonathan D. Stanley collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Myanmar. Jonathan D. Stanley's co-authors include F. Todd DeZoort, J. Gregory Jenkins, Bryan K. Church, Carl W. Hollingsworth, Susan McCracken, Travis P. Holt, James H. Long, Tina M. Loraas, Gary K. Taylor and Kerry K. Inger and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory and Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan D. Stanley

19 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan D. Stanley United States 10 538 221 114 90 43 20 611
John Daniel Eshleman United States 11 673 1.3× 269 1.2× 135 1.2× 103 1.1× 78 1.8× 17 753
Kyle Peterson United States 10 481 0.9× 203 0.9× 185 1.6× 82 0.9× 78 1.8× 21 558
Michael F. Peters United States 9 797 1.5× 295 1.3× 185 1.6× 106 1.2× 70 1.6× 20 866
Nicole V.S. Ratzinger‐Sakel Germany 11 383 0.7× 127 0.6× 69 0.6× 81 0.9× 29 0.7× 29 468
Chen‐Lung Chin Taiwan 12 729 1.4× 258 1.2× 191 1.7× 110 1.2× 61 1.4× 35 802
Pran Krishansing Boolaky Australia 13 425 0.8× 168 0.8× 50 0.4× 116 1.3× 43 1.0× 37 500
Nisan Langberg United States 10 304 0.6× 106 0.5× 163 1.4× 72 0.8× 89 2.1× 27 391
Christine E.L. Tan United States 10 516 1.0× 166 0.8× 158 1.4× 133 1.5× 31 0.7× 25 611
Khrystyna Bochkay United States 10 307 0.6× 148 0.7× 150 1.3× 47 0.5× 54 1.3× 20 455
Sheela Thiruvadi United States 5 547 1.0× 209 0.9× 50 0.4× 24 0.3× 39 0.9× 10 600

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan D. Stanley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan D. Stanley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan D. Stanley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan D. Stanley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan D. Stanley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan D. Stanley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan D. Stanley. The network helps show where Jonathan D. Stanley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan D. Stanley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan D. Stanley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan D. Stanley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan D. Stanley. Jonathan D. Stanley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Brandon, Duane M., et al.. (2024). The case of Bitcoins: Examining the financial accounting and reporting issues surrounding cryptocurrencies. Journal of Accounting Education. 67. 100902–100902. 2 indexed citations
3.
Holt, Travis P., Kerry K. Inger, J. Gregory Jenkins, et al.. (2023). Artificial Intelligence’s Capabilities, Limitations, and Impact on Accounting Education: Investigating ChatGPT’s Performance on Educational Accounting Cases. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12 indexed citations
4.
Holt, Travis P., Kerry K. Inger, J. Gregory Jenkins, et al.. (2023). Artificial Intelligence’s Capabilities, Limitations, and Impact on Accounting Education: Investigating ChatGPT’s Performance on Educational Accounting Cases. Issues in Accounting Education. 39(2). 23–47. 21 indexed citations
5.
Jenkins, J. Gregory, Tina M. Loraas, & Jonathan D. Stanley. (2023). Auditors’ Remote Work Experiences during the Early Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Implications Going Forward. Accounting Horizons. 38(4). 123–135. 4 indexed citations
6.
DeZoort, F. Todd, Travis P. Holt, & Jonathan D. Stanley. (2022). How Do Investor and Auditor Materiality Judgments Compare?. Current Issues in Auditing. 17(1). P1–P10. 2 indexed citations
7.
Jenkins, J. Gregory & Jonathan D. Stanley. (2019). A Current Evaluation of Independence as a Foundational Element of the Auditing Profession in the United States. Current Issues in Auditing. 13(1). P17–P27. 7 indexed citations
8.
Church, Bryan K., J. Gregory Jenkins, & Jonathan D. Stanley. (2018). Auditor Independence in the United States: Cornerstone of the Profession or Thorn in Our Side?. Accounting Horizons. 32(3). 145–168. 23 indexed citations
9.
DeZoort, F. Todd, Travis P. Holt, & Jonathan D. Stanley. (2018). A Comparative Analysis of Investor and Auditor Materiality Judgments. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 38(3). 149–166. 13 indexed citations
10.
Long, James H., et al.. (2018). Pane in the Glass: A Review of the Accounting Cycle. Issues in Accounting Education. 34(1). 35–50. 6 indexed citations
11.
Stanley, Jonathan D., Duane M. Brandon, & Jeffrey J. McMillan. (2015). Does lowballing impair audit quality? Evidence from client accruals surrounding analyst forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 34(6). 625–645. 1 indexed citations
12.
Church, Bryan K., et al.. (2014). Auditor Independence in Fact: Research, Regulatory, and Practice Implications Drawn from Experimental and Archival Research. Accounting Horizons. 29(1). 217–238. 40 indexed citations
13.
Inger, Kerry K., James H. Long, Tina M. Loraas, & Jonathan D. Stanley. (2013). The Mysterious Case of the Loaded Leprechaun. Issues in Accounting Education. 28(4). 975–978. 1 indexed citations
14.
Hollingsworth, Carl W., et al.. (2011). Recent Auditor Downgrade Activity and Changes in Clients' Discretionary Accruals. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 30(3). 33–58. 33 indexed citations
15.
Stanley, Jonathan D.. (2011). Is the Audit Fee Disclosure a Leading Indicator of Clients' Business Risk?. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 30(3). 157–179. 136 indexed citations
16.
Church, Bryan K., et al.. (2011). Auditor Rotation: The PCAOB Considers a New Direction. Current Issues in Auditing. 5(2). C15–C20. 14 indexed citations
17.
Hollingsworth, Carl W., et al.. (2010). Recent Auditor Downgrade Activity and Changes in Clients’ Discretionary Accruals. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
18.
Stanley, Jonathan D., et al.. (2009). The association between insider trading surrounding going concern audit opinions and future bankruptcy. Managerial Auditing Journal. 24(3). 290–312. 9 indexed citations
19.
Stanley, Jonathan D. & F. Todd DeZoort. (2007). Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: An analysis of industry specialization and fee effects. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 26(2). 131–159. 282 indexed citations
20.
Stanley, Jonathan D.. (1987). A forward convex-simplex method. European Journal of Operational Research. 29(3). 328–335. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026