Issues in Accounting Education

894 papers and 13.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 894 papers published in Issues in Accounting Education in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Issues in Accounting Education usually cover Accounting (621 papers), Management Information Systems (211 papers) and Education (172 papers) specifically the topics of Accounting Education and Careers (511 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (328 papers) and Management and Marketing Education (163 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Issues in Accounting Education are Fred Phillips, Sridhar Ramamoorti, Amelia A. Baldwin, Madhav V. Rajan, George Foster, Charles T. Horngren, Srikant M. Datar, A. Faye Borthick, David A. Wood and Sarah Bonner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Issues in Accounting Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Issues in Accounting Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Issues in Accounting Education.

Countries where authors publish in Issues in Accounting Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Issues in Accounting Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Issues in Accounting Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Issues in Accounting Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025