Jonas Everaert

2.9k citations
57 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 24

Jonas Everaert

55 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Jonas Everaert
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 894
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 120
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 645
  • Applied Psychology 144
Replace Tony T. Wells with:
Tony T. Wells United States
Lauren S. Hallion United States
Nilly Mor Israel
Abby Adler United States
Amit Lazarov Israel
Jonathan M. Oakman Canada
Evi De Lissnyder Belgium
Richard T. LeBeau United States
Bryan T. Denny United States
Lena Jelinek Germany
Jonas Everaert relative to Tony T. Wells United States Tony T. Wells's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Tony T. Wells · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Everaert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Everaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Everaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Everaert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Everaert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Everaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Everaert. The network helps show where Jonas Everaert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Everaert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Everaert Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Everaert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20253
2 20247
3 20234
4 20236
5 20238
6 20226
7 202212
8 202236
9 202145
10 202058
11 201976
12 201856
13 20184
14 201655
15 201514
16 201525
17 201535
18 2014142
19
The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression: a state-of-the-art
20123
20 2012229

About Jonas Everaert

Jonas Everaert is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (37 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (36 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (27 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (12 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (3 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (894 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (120 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (645 citations) and Applied Psychology (144 citations). Jonas Everaert has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ernst H. W. Koster, Jutta Joormann, Nazanin Derakshan, Michael V. Bronstein, Ioana R. Podină, Wouter Duyck, Tyrone D. Cannon, Ivan Grahek, Álvaro Sánchez-López and Rudi De Raedt. Their work appears in journals such as Emotion, Clinical Psychological Science, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Clinical Psychology Review and Cognition & Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026