Ernst H. W. Koster
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.02%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Rudi De RaedtGeert CrombezJosh M. CislerBruno VerschuèreNazanin DerakshanJan De HouwerEvi De LissnyderJonas Everaert
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (148 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (107 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (67 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological BulletinSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ernst H. W. Koster
230 papers receiving 13.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 9.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 6.3k
- Clinical Psychology 5.1k
- Social Psychology 1.9k
- Behavioral Neuroscience 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Ernst H. W. Koster
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernst H. W. Koster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernst H. W. Koster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst H. W. Koster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernst H. W. Koster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernst H. W. Koster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernst H. W. Koster. The network helps show where Ernst H. W. Koster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernst H. W. Koster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernst H. W. Koster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernst H. W. Koster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ernst H. W. Koster. Ernst H. W. Koster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 196 | |
| 7 | 138 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 55 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 142 | |
| 16 | 85 | |
| 17 | The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression: a state-of-the-art | 3 |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 189 | |
| 20 | Aandachtsfocus tijdens exposurebehandeling van angst: theorie en empirie | 1 |
About Ernst H. W. Koster
Ernst H. W. Koster is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 241 papers that have together received 14.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (148 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (107 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (67 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (9.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (6.3k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (1.1k citations). Ernst H. W. Koster has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rudi De Raedt, Geert Crombez, Josh M. Cisler, Bruno Verschuère, Nazanin Derakshan, Jan De Houwer, Evi De Lissnyder, Jonas Everaert, Stefaan Van Damme and Kristof Hoorelbeke. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.