Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Religious Question in Modern China
2011288 citationsVincent Goossaert et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Vincent Goossaert
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Vincent Goossaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vincent Goossaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vincent Goossaert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vincent Goossaert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vincent Goossaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vincent Goossaert. The network helps show where Vincent Goossaert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vincent Goossaert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vincent Goossaert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vincent Goossaert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Vincent Goossaert. Vincent Goossaert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Goossaert, Vincent. (2013). Critical readings on chinese religions. BRILL eBooks.
9.
Goossaert, Vincent. (2012). A Question of Control: Licensing Local Ritual Specialists in Jiangnan, 1850-1950. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 569–604.2 indexed citations
10.
Goossaert, Vincent. (2011). Daoism and Local Cults in Modern Suzhou. A Case Study of Qionglongshan. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 199–228.1 indexed citations
Goossaert, Vincent, et al.. (2009). Temples and Daoists in Urban China since 1980. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 4(80). 32–41.4 indexed citations
Goossaert, Vincent. (2000). Dans les temples de la Chine. Histoire des cultes, vie des communautés. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 229.2 indexed citations
18.
Goossaert, Vincent. (2000). Poèmes taoïstes des cinq veilles. Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche). 19(1). 249–270.1 indexed citations
19.
Goossaert, Vincent. (1999). Krygier (Rivon). A la limite de Dieu. L' énigme de l'omniscience divine et du libre arbitre humain dans la pensée juive. Archives de sciences sociales des religions. 106(1). 121–121.
20.
Goossaert, Vincent. (1996). Gerd Wädow, T'ien-fei hsien-sheng lu, « Die Aufzeichnungen von der manifestierten Heiligkeit der Himmelsprinzessin. » Einleitung, Übersetzung, Kommentar, Nettetal, Steyler Verlag, 1992. (« Monumenta Serica Monograph Series », 29). Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.