Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts.
20041.1k citationsMaarten Vansteenkiste, Joke Simons et al.Journal of Personality and Social Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Joke Simons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joke Simons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joke Simons more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joke Simons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joke Simons. The network helps show where Joke Simons may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joke Simons
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joke Simons.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joke Simons based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joke Simons. Joke Simons is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Simons, Johan, et al.. (2011). The effect of body-awareness training of pre-school children based on the Sherborne developmental movement method versus regular physical education class. 4(1). 38–50.1 indexed citations
Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Joke Simons, Caroline Braet, Christine Bachman, & Edward L. Deci. (2005). Promoting maintained weight loss through healthy lifestyle changes among severly obese children: an experimental test of the self-determination theory. Lirias (KU Leuven).10 indexed citations
6.
Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Joke Simons, Willy Lens, Kennon M. Sheldon, & Edward L. Deci. (2004). Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 87(2). 246–260.1118 indexed citations breakdown →
Simons, Johan & Joke Simons. (2002). De constructie van een verkorte vragenlijst voor het evalueren van het zelfbeeld bij Vlaamse adolescenten. 5(2). 62–71.1 indexed citations
Simons, Joke, Siegfried Dewitte, & Willy Lens. (2001). The effect of different types of instrumentality on motivational and cognitive variables.11 indexed citations
15.
Simons, Joke. (2001). De betekenis van verschillende types instrumentaliteit voor de motivatie en de doelgerichtheid bij studenten.2 indexed citations
Simons, Johan & Joke Simons. (2001). De meting van het zelfconcept: onderzoek bij Vlaamse adolescenten met de Self Description Questionnaire III. 31(4). 207–217.2 indexed citations
Simons, Joke & Willy Lens. (1999). Met een 'gekleurde bril' doorheen de opleiding Leraar Kleuter Onderwijs.1 indexed citations
20.
Simons, Joke. (1997). De Europese vervoersintegratie, in het bijzonder concurrentieregels en zeehavens. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 33(4). 407–410.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.