John W. Newport
- Cell Biology top 0.1%
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 30
- Aging top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 0.2%
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 30
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 16
- Nuclear Structure and Function 13
- RNA Research and Splicing 11
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 8
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 7
- Oncology top 2%
- Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 7
- Genetics top 1%
- Co-authors
- Marc W. KirschnerWilliam G. DunphyJohannes C. WalterFang FangMary DassoCarl SmytheDouglass J. ForbesPeter H. von Hippel
- Cited by
- Cell BiologyAgingMolecular Biology
- Journals
- Science (3 papers)Cell (14 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John W. Newport
68 papers receiving 11.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Cell Biology 4.1k
- Aging 394
- Molecular Biology 10.2k
- Oncology 1.6k
- Genetics 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by John W. Newport
This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Newport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Newport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Newport more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Newport
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Newport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Newport. The network helps show where John W. Newport may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Newport, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 184 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 94 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 168 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 339 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 247 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 120 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 56 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 110 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 91 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 199 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 163 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 440 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 21 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 301 | |
| 20 | The Xenopus cdc2 protein is a component of MPF, a cytoplasmic regulator of mitosisbreakdown → | 1988 | 725 |
About John W. Newport
John W. Newport is a scholar working on Aging, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 11.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (30 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (30 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (16 papers), Nuclear Structure and Function (13 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (11 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (8 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (7 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (4.1k citations), Aging (394 citations) and Molecular Biology (10.2k citations). John W. Newport has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marc W. Kirschner, William G. Dunphy, Johannes C. Walter, Fang Fang, Mary Dasso, Carl Smythe, Douglass J. Forbes, Peter H. von Hippel, Leonardo Brizuela and Katherine L. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Cell and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.