Joan Ruderman
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 0.1%
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Aging top 1%
Papers in
- Cell Biology 38
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 37
- Aging 3
- Co-authors
- Francis C. LucaKatherine I. SwensonLaurie E. LittlepageAvram HershkoEllen K. ShibuyaJ M WestendorfBedrick B. GadeaAndrew Arnold
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (15 papers)Developmental Biology (12 papers)The Journal of Cell Biology (6 papers)Molecular Biology of the Cell (5 papers)Nature (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Joan Ruderman
74 papers receiving 8.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Cell Biology 3.9k
- Aging 234
- Molecular Biology 6.6k
- Oncology 2.3k
- Reproductive Medicine 378
Countries citing papers authored by Joan Ruderman
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Ruderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Ruderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Ruderman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Ruderman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Ruderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Ruderman. The network helps show where Joan Ruderman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joan Ruderman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 189 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 137 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 286 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 168 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 242 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 305 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 79 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 74 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 82 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 19 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 16 | The cyclosome, a large complex containing cyclin-selective ubiquitin ligase activity, targets cyclins for destruction at the end of mitosis. Hit paper breakdown → | 1995 | 626 |
| 17 | 1993 | 154 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 21 | |
| 19 | A novel cyclin encoded by a bcl1-linked candidate oncogene Hit paper breakdown → | 1991 | 1061 |
| 20 | 1991 | 19 |
About Joan Ruderman
Joan Ruderman is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Aging, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Oncology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 8.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (37 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (16 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (14 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (13 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (12 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (7 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (7 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (3.9k citations), Aging (234 citations), Molecular Biology (6.6k citations), Oncology (2.3k citations) and Reproductive Medicine (378 citations). Joan Ruderman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Francis C. Luca, Katherine I. Swenson, Laurie E. Littlepage, Avram Hershko, Ellen K. Shibuya, J M Westendorf, Bedrick B. Gadea, Andrew Arnold, Theodora Bloom and Toru Motokura. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Developmental Biology, The Journal of Cell Biology, Molecular Biology of the Cell and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.