Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review
2020304 citationsJohn W. Branch et al.Sensorsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by John W. Branch
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Branch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Branch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Branch more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Branch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Branch. The network helps show where John W. Branch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Branch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Branch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Branch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Branch. John W. Branch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Branch, John W., et al.. (2012). REMUESTREO ESTRUCTURADO DE CONTORNOS DE HUECOS EN SUPERFICIES 3D DE OBJETOS DE FORMA LIBRE UTILIZANDO BRESENHAM. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
13.
Torres, Germán Sánchez, et al.. (2012). REGISTRATION OF RANGE IMAGES USING A HISTOGRAM BASED METRIC. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
14.
Branch, John W., et al.. (2012). PLANEAMIENTO DE MINAS A CIELO ABIERTO MEDIANTE OPTIMIZACIÓN ESTOCÁSTICA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
15.
Velásquez, Juan D. & John W. Branch. (2012). EXAMPLES IN THE CLASSROOM: PATTERN CLASSIFICATION USING THE R LANGUAGE. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
16.
Branch, John W., et al.. (2011). A COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERT SYSTEMS AND AUTONOMIC COMPUTING PLUS MOBILE AGENT APPROACHES FOR FAULT MANAGEMENT.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
17.
Branch, John W., et al.. (2009). EL SECTOR MINERO EN EL NORDESTE ANTIOQUEÑO: UNA MIRADA A LA LUZ DE LA TEORIA DE LAS CAPACIDADES Y LOS RECURSOS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
18.
Torres, Germán Sánchez, et al.. (2009). AUTOMATIC VISUAL MODEL FOR CLASSIFICATION AND MEASUREMENT OF QUALITY OF FRUIT: CASE MANGIFERA INDICAL. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.7 indexed citations
19.
Builes, Jovani Alberto Jiménez, et al.. (2008). Comunicación en sistemas de múltiples robots desde la metodología MAD-Smart. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
20.
Branch, John W., et al.. (2006). Generación dinámica de la topologíade una red neuronal artificial del tipo perceptron multicapa. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.