John Virtue

16 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

John Virtue
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 259
  • Insect Science 158
  • Ecological Modeling 40
  • Forestry 34
  • Ecology 161
Replace Shane Campbell with:
Shane Campbell Australia
Elle Roosaluste Estonia
A. den Breeÿen South Africa
Deah Lieurance United States
Stephen F. Enloe United States
Sándor Bordács Hungary
Andreas Flohre Germany
Ingo Kowarik Germany
Ian J. Renne United States
Ari‐Pekka Huhta Finland
John Virtue relative to Shane Campbell Australia Shane Campbell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Shane Campbell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Virtue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Virtue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Virtue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Virtue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Virtue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Virtue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Virtue. The network helps show where John Virtue may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Virtue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Virtue Line = papers co-authored together John Virtue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2009178
2
Guidance for addressing the Australian Weed Risk Assessment questions
201074
3 200843
4 200831
5 201919
6 200517
7
Likelihood and Consequences: Reframing the Australian Weed Risk Assessment to Reflect a Standard Model of Risk
201016
8 201116
9
South Australia's Weed Risk Management System
201014
10 201712
11 20148
12 20215
13
Ten Year Post-fire Response of a Native Ecosystem in the Presence of High or Low Densities of the Invasive Weed, Asparagus asparagoides
20093
14
Host range of branched broomrape ('Orobanche ramosa subsp. mutelii') in South Australia
20143
15
Identifying and Managing Environmental Weed Risk In Perennial Pasture Research
20082
16 19981

About John Virtue

John Virtue is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Forestry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biological Control of Invasive Species (11 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (5 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (3 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (259 citations), Insect Science (158 citations), Ecological Modeling (40 citations), Forestry (34 citations) and Ecology (161 citations). John Virtue has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include L. Morin, Paul Downey, Kris French, F. D. Panetta, Margaret Byrne, Curtis C. Daehler, Christopher Preston, Daphne A. Onderdonk, Keith B. Ferdinands and Talia A. Wittmann. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Biological Control, Journal of Environmental Management and Wildlife Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact