Ingo Kowarik
- Plant Science top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- M. WadeMarcel RejmánekKarel PrachPetr PyšekMoritz von der LippeStefan ZerbeUlrich HeinkJames M. Bullock
- Topics
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers)Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers)Plant and animal studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsEcological Modeling
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Ingo Kowarik
16 papers receiving 527 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Plant Science 310
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 281
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 226
- Ecology 175
- Insect Science 122
Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Kowarik
This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Kowarik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Kowarik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Kowarik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Kowarik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Kowarik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Kowarik. The network helps show where Ingo Kowarik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingo Kowarik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingo Kowarik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingo Kowarik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingo Kowarik. Ingo Kowarik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Nature conservation risk assessment of invasive, potentially invasive and wild alien plant species in Germany. | 2 |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Biologische Invasionen: Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa | 111 |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. | 305 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Ecological consequences of the introduction and dissemination of new plant species; an analogy with the release of genetically engineered organisms. | 3 |
About Ingo Kowarik
Ingo Kowarik is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (281 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (226 citations) and Ecological Modeling (47 citations). Ingo Kowarik has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include M. Wade, Marcel Rejmánek, Karel Prach, Petr Pyšek, Moritz von der Lippe, Stefan Zerbe, Ulrich Heink, James M. Bullock, Matthias Wichmann and Ina Säumel. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Conservation Biology and Ecography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.