John V. Richardson
- Information Systems top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Library and Information Sciences top 0.5%
- Communication top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Topics
- Library Science and Information Literacy (9 papers)Library Science and Administration (6 papers)Library Science and Information (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPakistanChile
In The Last Decade
John V. Richardson
34 papers receiving 382 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Information Systems 208
- Safety Research 128
- Library and Information Sciences 114
- Communication 79
- Information Systems and Management 79
Countries citing papers authored by John V. Richardson
This map shows the geographic impact of John V. Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John V. Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John V. Richardson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John V. Richardson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John V. Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John V. Richardson. The network helps show where John V. Richardson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John V. Richardson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John V. Richardson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John V. Richardson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John V. Richardson. John V. Richardson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | Reference Is Better than We Thought. | 25 |
| 6 | The Peer Review Process: Acceptances, Revisions, and Outright Rejections. | 1 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | Knowledge-based systems for general reference work | 8 |
| 13 | New Challenges: An Interview with U.S. Superintendent of Documents Wayne P. Kelley, Jr., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20401 | 8 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Microcomputer software for performing statistical analysis : a handbook supporting library decision making | 1 |
| 17 | Government Information: Education and Research, 1928-1986 | 1 |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About John V. Richardson
John V. Richardson is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science and Information Systems, having authored 42 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (9 papers), Library Science and Administration (6 papers) and Library Science and Information (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (114 citations), Health Informatics (27 citations) and Safety Research (128 citations). John V. Richardson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Khalid Mahmood, Donald O. Case, Bryce Allen, Peter Hernon and Elaine Svenonius. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, College & Research Libraries and Library Hi Tech.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.