John Singleton

78 papers receiving 772 citations

Peers

John Singleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Biochemistry 93
  • Inorganic Chemistry 142
  • Plant Science 303
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 109
  • Food Science 127
Replace Y. TAMURA with:
Y. TAMURA Japan
Vernon L. Frampton United States
Margaret Attwood United Kingdom
Bruno Maurer Switzerland
K. T. Achaya India
Subrata Laskar India
Otto Schmidt Germany
Hiroshi Sagami Japan
Béatrice Craig Canada
Toshiyuki Hamada Japan
John Singleton relative to Y. TAMURA Japan Y. TAMURA's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Y. TAMURA · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Singleton. The network helps show where John Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Singleton Line = papers co-authored together John Singleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197476
2 196637
3 201037
4 199836
5 196536
6 198431
7 197531
8 196928
9 199525
10 197025
11 198723
12 199523
13 196321
14 197420
15 201020
16 196519
17 197717
18 199515
19 196715
20 199915

About John Singleton

John Singleton is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Inorganic Chemistry and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 84 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peanut Plant Research Studies (26 papers), Coconut Research and Applications (12 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (8 papers), Australian History and Society (7 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers) and Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (93 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (142 citations), Plant Science (303 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (109 citations) and Food Science (127 citations). John Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include H. E. Pattee, Timothy H. Sanders, Larry F. Stikeleather, Leonard W. Aurand, Thomas A. Bell, Grietjie Verhoef, J. L. Etchells, Thomas A. McKeon, Jiann‐Tsyh Lin and Carol A. Haney. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Journal of Food Science, Australian Economic History Review, Business History and Journal of Dairy Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact