John Seelye

636 citations
35 papers · 134 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • History top 5%
    • American Literature and Culture
    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis

Papers in

John Seelye

23 papers receiving 56 citations

Peers

John Seelye
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • History 50
  • Literature and Literary Theory 51
  • Music 8
  • Anthropology 21
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 1
Replace Lewis P. Simpson with:
Lewis P. Simpson United States
Margaret Fuller
Margaret Dickie United States
Wai-Chee Dimock United States
Norman S. Grabo United States
W. M. Verhoeven Netherlands
Lora Romero United States
Clifford Leech United Kingdom
William Wells Brown
Elizabeth Ammons United States
John Seelye relative to Lewis P. Simpson United States Lewis P. Simpson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lewis P. Simpson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Seelye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Seelye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Seelye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Seelye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Seelye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Seelye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Seelye. The network helps show where John Seelye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John Seelye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Seelye Line = papers co-authored together John Seelye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Beyond Boundaries: Rereading John Steinbeck
200220
2 197619
3 197010
4 19799
5 19779
6 20018
7 19928
8 19716
9 19785
10 19805
11 19994
12 19714
13 19654
14 19993
15 19613
16 19812
17 19652
18 19712
19 19712
20 19632

About John Seelye

John Seelye is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, History, Political Science and International Relations and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 35 papers that have together received 134 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (7 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers), American Literature and Humor Studies (4 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), American Literature and Culture (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Latin American history and culture (2 papers) and Travel Writing and Literature (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (50 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (51 citations), Music (8 citations), Anthropology (21 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (1 citation). John Seelye has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sacvan Bercovitch, Everett Emerson, James C. Kelley, J. A. Leo Lemay, P. L. Gould, Willard Thorp, Robert D. Richardson, Peter S. Onuf, Philip F. Gura and Herman Melville. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, American Quarterly, The New England Quarterly, Journal of the Early Republic and Film Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact