Wai-Chee Dimock

508 citations
9 papers · 145 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
    • Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
  • History top 5%
    • American Literature and Culture

Papers in

    • American and British Literature Analysis 2
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 2
    • American Jewish Fiction Analysis 2
    • American Literature and Culture 2

Wai-Chee Dimock

8 papers receiving 46 citations

Peers

Wai-Chee Dimock
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Literature and Literary Theory 98
  • History 28
  • Anthropology 15
  • Philosophy 16
  • Music 4
Replace Ian Haywood with:
Ian Haywood United Kingdom
Margaret Fuller
Lora Romero United States
Hana Wirth-Nesher Israel
Gregory W. Bredbeck United States
P. N. Furbank United Kingdom
Arnold Kettle
Judie Newman United Kingdom
William W. Stowe United States
Linda K. Hughes United States
Wai-Chee Dimock relative to Ian Haywood United Kingdom Ian Haywood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ian Haywood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wai-Chee Dimock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wai-Chee Dimock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wai-Chee Dimock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wai-Chee Dimock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wai-Chee Dimock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wai-Chee Dimock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wai-Chee Dimock. The network helps show where Wai-Chee Dimock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Wai-Chee Dimock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wai-Chee Dimock Line = papers co-authored together Wai-Chee Dimock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 199050
2
Rethinking class : literary studies and social formations
199445
3 198524
4 20037
5 19917
6 19896
7 19855
8 19901
9 20160

About Wai-Chee Dimock

Wai-Chee Dimock is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Museology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers), American Literature and Culture (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), American Jewish Fiction Analysis (2 papers), Philippine History and Culture (1 paper), Historical Art and Culture Studies (1 paper), Globalization and Cultural Identity (1 paper) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (98 citations), History (28 citations), Anthropology (15 citations), Philosophy (16 citations) and Music (4 citations). Wai-Chee Dimock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael T. Gilmore, Robert S. Levine and Larry J. Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, American Literature, American Quarterly, ˜The œHenry James review and boundary 2.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact