W. M. Verhoeven
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- History top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Steven MaillouxMark BauerleinC. J. E. A. BulderRobert S. LevineJ. W. M. la RivièreChristopher LoobyMalcolm Kelsall
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers)Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers)Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
W. M. Verhoeven
18 papers receiving 44 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Literature and Literary Theory 41
- History 30
- Philosophy 26
- Political Science and International Relations 19
- Sociology and Political Science 13
Countries citing papers authored by W. M. Verhoeven
This map shows the geographic impact of W. M. Verhoeven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. M. Verhoeven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. M. Verhoeven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. M. Verhoeven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. M. Verhoeven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. M. Verhoeven. The network helps show where W. M. Verhoeven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. M. Verhoeven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. M. Verhoeven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. M. Verhoeven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. M. Verhoeven. W. M. Verhoeven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | The Novels and Selected Plays of Thomas Holcroft, 5 vols. (General Editor): General Introduction | 1 |
| 3 | Gilbert Imlay and the Triangular Trade | 2 |
| 4 | Anti-Jacobin novels | 2 |
| 5 | "This blissful period of intellectual liberty": Transatlantic Radicalism and Enlightened Conservatism in Brown's Early Writings | 3 |
| 6 | Revolutionary Histories. Transatlantic Cultural Nationalism, 1775-1815 | 5 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | How Hyphenated Can You Get? A Critique of Pure Ethnicity | 4 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Making America/Making AMERICAN LITERATURE. FRANKLIN TO COOPER. | 3 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About W. M. Verhoeven
W. M. Verhoeven is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 33 papers that have together received 103 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (41 citations), History (30 citations) and Philosophy (26 citations). W. M. Verhoeven has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Steven Mailloux, Mark Bauerlein, C. J. E. A. Bulder, Robert S. Levine, J. W. M. la Rivière, Christopher Looby and Malcolm Kelsall. Their work appears in journals such as Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, The Modern Language Review and The William and Mary Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.