Peter Friend

452 total citations
17 papers, 342 citations indexed

About

Peter Friend is a scholar working on Surgery, Immunology and Transplantation. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Friend has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 342 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Immunology and 3 papers in Transplantation. Recurrent topics in Peter Friend's work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (3 papers), Xenotransplantation and immune response (3 papers) and Complement system in diseases (3 papers). Peter Friend is often cited by papers focused on Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (3 papers), Xenotransplantation and immune response (3 papers) and Complement system in diseases (3 papers). Peter Friend collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Peter Friend's co-authors include Edmond J. Yunis, Robert A. Good, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes, G Hale, Herman Waldmann, Stephen Cobbold, Bob Soin, John R. Bradley, Andrew Lockhart and Afzal Zaidi and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Annals of Internal Medicine and Kidney International.

In The Last Decade

Peter Friend

16 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Friend United Kingdom	8	100	94	64	63	57	17	342
Geneviève Beaurain France	8	94 0.9×	53 0.6×	93 1.5×	64 1.0×	36 0.6×	9	349
Lisa J. Murray-Segal Australia	9	92 0.9×	231 2.5×	75 1.2×	110 1.7×	17 0.3×	13	433
Mohanraj Sadasivam United States	13	130 1.3×	42 0.4×	94 1.5×	26 0.4×	29 0.5×	24	384
James Shoaf United States	4	91 0.9×	35 0.4×	114 1.8×	5 0.1×	137 2.4×	4	328
Hirofumi Makino Japan	6	52 0.5×	22 0.2×	71 1.1×	55 0.9×	81 1.4×	8	382
Marja‐Liisa Solin Finland	10	58 0.6×	26 0.3×	192 3.0×	72 1.1×	23 0.4×	13	392
Chava Rosen Israel	8	57 0.6×	51 0.5×	44 0.7×	26 0.4×	22 0.4×	16	238
Y Namii Japan	10	40 0.4×	128 1.4×	53 0.8×	127 2.0×	12 0.2×	42	359
Annabel Tuckfield Australia	10	46 0.5×	11 0.1×	172 2.7×	36 0.6×	19 0.3×	15	393
N. P. Aardal Norway	9	61 0.6×	107 1.1×	75 1.2×	27 0.4×	50 0.9×	12	463

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Friend

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Friend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Friend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Friend more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Friend

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Friend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Friend. The network helps show where Peter Friend may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Friend

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Friend. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Friend based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Friend. Peter Friend is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Greco, Karin Vicente, Gauraang Bhatnagar, Simon Gabe, et al.. (2025). The Development and Characterisation of A Porcine Large Intestinal Biological Scaffold by Perfusion Decellularisation. Cells. 14(11). 817–817.

Finotti, Michele, Anji Wall, Anthony M. D’Alessandro, et al.. (2024). The Dallas Donation after Circulatory Death Transplantation Summit: expanding donation after circulatory death procedures through process improvement, broader utilization, and innovation. HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition. 13(5). 824–836. 1 indexed citations

Dengu, Fungai, Guozheng Wang, Alireza Morovat, et al.. (2024). P.028: Optimisation of donation after circulatory death livers – removal of extracellular histones during normothermic perfusion and following whole blood reperfusion in an ex-situ porcine model.. Transplantation. 108(9S). 1 indexed citations

Kelly, Matt, et al.. (2010). Initial assessment of a model relating intratumoral genetic heterogeneity to radiological morphology. British Journal of Radiology. 83(986). 166–170. 2 indexed citations

Quiroga, I, J. Procter, Lucia Cerundolo, et al.. (2002). C4d deposition in early renal allograft protocol biopsies. The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology. 198. 1 indexed citations

Lockhart, Andrew, Emanuele Cozzi, Marion L. Scott, et al.. (2001). Erythropoietin activity between species: a model for hormonal compatibility in xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 8. 131–131. 2 indexed citations

Soin, Bob, Kenneth G. C. Smith, Afzal Zaidi, et al.. (2001). Physiological aspects of pig-to-primate renal xenotransplantation. Kidney International. 60(4). 1592–1597. 68 indexed citations

Harrison, R. A., Conrad Vial, Bob Soin, et al.. (2000). TP10 (sCR1) increases protection against complement-mediated damage following xeno-transplantation of hDAF transgenic pig kidneys into cynomolgus monkeys. Immunopharmacology. 49(1-2). 63–63. 1 indexed citations

Rebello, P, G Hale, Peter Friend, Stephen Cobbold, & Herman Waldmann. (1999). ANTI-GLOBULIN RESPONSES TO RAT AND HUMANIZED CAMPATH-1 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY USED TO TREAT TRANSPLANT REJECTION1. Transplantation. 68(9). 1417–1419. 40 indexed citations

10.

Jonker, Margreet, Miriam A. Ossevoort, Eva-Maria Kuhn, et al.. (1998). Induction of kidney graft acceptance by creating a window of opportunity for immunologic engagement (WOFIE) in rhesus monkeys. Transplantation Proceedings. 30(5). 2441–2443. 9 indexed citations

11.

Joysey, V., Hannah L. Morgan, C. E. Ford, et al.. (1992). Lymphocyte chimaerism after organ transplantation.. PubMed. 24(6). 2519–22. 12 indexed citations

12.

Jamieson, Neville V., et al.. (1991). Orthotopic liver transplantation at Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge 1968 to 1991.. PubMed. 119–25. 2 indexed citations

13.

Friend, Peter, Helen Tighe, Herman Waldmann, et al.. (1988). MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES THAT RECOGNIZE ACTIVATED HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES - EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL-STUDIES. Transplantation Proceedings. 20. 265–266. 3 indexed citations

14.

Waldmann, Herman, G Hale, Mike A. Clark, et al.. (1988). Monoclonal Antibodies for Immunosuppression. Chemical immunology/Fortschritte der Allergielehre/Progress in allergy/Chemical immunology and allergy. 45. 16–30. 7 indexed citations

15.

Hale, G, Herman Waldmann, Peter Friend, & R Y Calne. (1986). Pilot study of CAMPATH-1, a rat monoclonal antibody that fixes human complement, as an immunosuppressant in organ transplantation.. PubMed. 42(3). 308–11. 25 indexed citations

16.

Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira, Peter Friend, Edmond J. Yunis, & Robert A. Good. (1978). Influence of dietary restriction on immunologic function and renal disease in (NZB × NZW) F ₁ mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 75(3). 1500–1504. 132 indexed citations

17.

Friend, Peter, John E. Repine, Youngki Kim, C. C. Clawson, & Alfred F. Michael. (1975). Deficiency of the Second Component of Complement (C2) with Chronic Vasculitis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 83(6). 813–816. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact