John Moles

2.1k citations
27 papers · 149 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 5%
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

John Moles

24 papers receiving 105 citations

Peers

John Moles
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Anthropology 100
  • Classics 32
  • Archeology 65
  • Philosophy 52
  • Religious studies 19
Replace Eduard Norden with:
Eduard Norden
Ken Dowden United Kingdom
Michael A. Flower United States
Carl Joachim Classen Germany
C. Robert Phillips United States
A. M. Bowie United Kingdom
Tomas Hägg Norway
E. L. Bowie United States
Robert Schmiel Canada
Robert Maltby United Kingdom
John Moles relative to Eduard Norden Eduard Norden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Eduard Norden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Moles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Moles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Moles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Moles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Moles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Moles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Moles. The network helps show where John Moles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside John Moles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Moles Line = papers co-authored together John Moles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20111
2 20113
3
Jesus and Dionysus in The Acts of the Apostles and early Christianity
20065
4 20021
5 20022
6 20002
7
El cosmopolitismo cínico
20001
8 19991
9 199513
10 19944
11 19940
12
Plutarch, Vit. Ant. 31.3 and Suetonius, Aug. 69.2
19921
13
The life of Cicero
19883
14 19856
15 19841
16 19845
17 19849
18 19830
19 19836
20 197829

About John Moles

John Moles is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics, Philosophy, Archeology and Religious studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (17 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (9 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (8 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers) and Joseph Conrad and Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (100 citations), Classics (32 citations), Archeology (65 citations), Philosophy (52 citations) and Religious studies (19 citations). John Moles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Plutarch, A. A. Long, Antonina Alberti, André Laks, Brad Inwood, David E. Hahm, Jean-Louis Ferrary and Julia Annas. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Hellenic Studies, The Journal of Roman Studies, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, Apeiron and The Classical World.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026