Tomas Hägg

810 citations
20 papers · 169 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Tomas Hägg

15 papers receiving 84 citations

Peers

Tomas Hägg
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Anthropology 98
  • Classics 27
  • Archeology 68
  • Religious studies 31
  • Literature and Literary Theory 27
Replace Stephen Scully with:
Stephen Scully United States
Richard P. Martín United States
Hugh J. Mason Canada
Robert Schmiel Canada
Ken Dowden United Kingdom
T. J. Luce United States
Reinhold Merkelbach Germany
B. P. Reardon France
Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff
Eduard Norden
Tomas Hägg relative to Stephen Scully United States Stephen Scully's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Stephen Scully · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomas Hägg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomas Hägg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomas Hägg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomas Hägg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomas Hägg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomas Hägg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomas Hägg. The network helps show where Tomas Hägg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Tomas Hägg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomas Hägg Line = papers co-authored together Tomas Hägg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201225
2 20110
3
The Virgin and Her Lover: Fragments of an Ancient Greek Novel and a Persian Epic Poem
20037
4 20010
5 19991
6 199213
7 19905
8 19895
9
Nubian culture, past and present : main papers presented at the Sixth International Conference for Nubian Studies in Uppsala, 11-16 August, 1986
19879
10
Eros und Tyche : der Roman in der antiken Welt
19870
11 198714
12 19861
13 19861
14 19850
15 19846
16
The novel in antiquity
198359
17 19821
18
Photios als Vermittler antiker Literatur : Untersuchungen zur technik des Referierens und Exzerpierens in der Bibliotheke
19756
19
Photius at Work: Evidence from the Text of the Bibliotheca
19733
20 197213

About Tomas Hägg

Tomas Hägg is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics, Archeology, Conservation and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 20 papers that have together received 169 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (2 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper) and Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (98 citations), Classics (27 citations), Archeology (68 citations), Religious studies (31 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (27 citations). Tomas Hägg has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Harrison, Bo Utas and Warren Treadgold. Their work appears in journals such as Symbolae Osloenses, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies, Classical Antiquity and Dumbarton Oaks Papers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026