Michael A. Flower
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Archeology top 5%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Ancient Near East History
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
Papers in
- Anthropology 11
- Classical Antiquity Studies 11
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 2
- Co-authors
- John MarincolaC. Robert PhillipsGeorge CawkwellMark ToherElizabeth CarneyThomas HarrisonHerodotus
- Journals
- The Classical Quarterly (3 papers)The Classical World (3 papers)Phoenix (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael A. Flower
12 papers receiving 92 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Anthropology 112
- Archeology 72
- Classics 23
- Religious studies 14
- General Arts and Humanities 3
Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Flower
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Flower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Flower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Flower more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Flower
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Flower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Flower. The network helps show where Michael A. Flower may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Flower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 30 | |
| 7 | Histories, Book V | 2002 | 0 |
| 8 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 13 | Georgica : Greek studies in honour of George Cawkwell | 1991 | 13 |
| 14 | 1991 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1985 | 1 |
About Michael A. Flower
Michael A. Flower is a scholar working on Anthropology, Religious studies, Classics, Archeology and Philosophy, having authored 16 papers that have together received 148 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (11 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (1 paper), Study and Philosophy of Religion (1 paper), Chinese history and philosophy (1 paper) and Ancient Near East History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (112 citations), Archeology (72 citations), Classics (23 citations), Religious studies (14 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (3 citations). Michael A. Flower has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Marincola, C. Robert Phillips, George Cawkwell, Mark Toher, Elizabeth Carney, Thomas Harrison and Herodotus. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical Quarterly, The Classical World, Phoenix, The American Historical Review and Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.