This map shows the geographic impact of John McAvoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McAvoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McAvoy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McAvoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McAvoy. The network helps show where John McAvoy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John McAvoy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John McAvoy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John McAvoy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John McAvoy. John McAvoy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McAvoy, John & Tom Butler. (2017). CAUSAL FRAMEWORK THROUGH RETRODUCTION AND RETRODICTION. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1314–1326.2 indexed citations
5.
Djemame, Karim, et al.. (2014). Trust and Risk Relationship Analysis on a Workflow Basis: A Use Case. 7–12.1 indexed citations
6.
McAvoy, John, Tadhg Nagle, & David Sammon. (2013). A novel approach to challenging consensus in evaluations: The Agitation Workshop. Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland). 16(1). 45–55.3 indexed citations
Sammon, David, Tadhg Nagle, & John McAvoy. (2012). THE ISD PROCESS AS A ?LIVE ROUTINE?: THE MINDLESS BEHAVIOURS OF A NARRATIVE NETWORK. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 44(9). 211-1–211-13.1 indexed citations
Nagle, Tadhg, John McAvoy, & David Sammon. (2011). UTILISING MINDFULNESS TO ANALYSE AGILE GLOBAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 119-1–119-13.6 indexed citations
11.
McAvoy, John & Tom Butler. (2009). The Dilution of Effort in Self‑Evaluating Development Teams: Agile Loafing. 12(2).6 indexed citations
Butler, Tom & John McAvoy. (2008). Social Inclusion and IT Education: An Institutional Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 70.2 indexed citations
14.
McAvoy, John, et al.. (2006). Towards the development of a simple tool to assist in agile methodology adoption decisions: agile adoption matrix. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2101–2110.1 indexed citations
15.
McAvoy, John & Tom Butler. (2006). Looking for a place to hide: a study of social loafing in agile teams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 596–607.3 indexed citations
16.
McAvoy, John & David Sammon. (2005). Agile Methodology Adoption Decisions: An Innovative Approach to Teaching and Learning. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 16(4). 409–420.14 indexed citations
17.
McAvoy, John & Tom Butler. (2005). A Paradox of the Change to User Stories: The Application of the Theory of Competing Commitments. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1103–1114.1 indexed citations
Fee, Henry J., et al.. (1978). Pseudoaneurysm of the axillary artery following a modified Bristow operation: report of a case and review.. PubMed. 19(1). 65–8.24 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.