John Makeham
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen C. AngleBill MalcolmKevin H. NguyenCarsten E. PalmeMichael ElliottFaruque RiffatDaniel NovakovicDaniel Phung
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (27 papers)Japanese History and Culture (4 papers)Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
John Makeham
33 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Sociology and Political Science 277
- Cultural Studies 91
- Political Science and International Relations 80
- Religious studies 31
- Philosophy 27
Countries citing papers authored by John Makeham
This map shows the geographic impact of John Makeham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Makeham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Makeham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Makeham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Makeham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Makeham. The network helps show where John Makeham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Makeham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Makeham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Makeham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Makeham. John Makeham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Learning to Emulate the Wise: The Genesis of Chinese Philosophy as an Academic Discipline in Twentieth-Century China | 11 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | Thinking with Cases: Specialist Knowledge in Chinese Cultural History | 15 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | Contemporary Chinese Thought | 12 |
| 10 | Cultural, ethnic, and political nationalism in contemporary Taiwan : bentuhua | 21 |
| 11 | Bentuhua: Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan | 3 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | Coping with Change, Australian Farming since 1970 | 2 |
About John Makeham
John Makeham is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies, having authored 44 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (27 papers), Japanese History and Culture (4 papers) and Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (91 citations), Sociology and Political Science (277 citations) and Religious studies (31 citations). John Makeham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephen C. Angle, Bill Malcolm, Kevin H. Nguyen, Carsten E. Palme, Michael Elliott, Faruque Riffat, Daniel Novakovic and Daniel Phung. Their work appears in journals such as ANZ Journal of Surgery, History and Theory and Philosophy East and West.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.