Daniel K. Gardner

120 total papers · 634 total citations
31 papers, 225 citations indexed

About

Daniel K. Gardner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel K. Gardner has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 225 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Cultural Studies and 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Daniel K. Gardner's work include Chinese history and philosophy (9 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers). Daniel K. Gardner is often cited by papers focused on Chinese history and philosophy (9 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers). Daniel K. Gardner collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Italy. Daniel K. Gardner's co-authors include Edward Slingerland, Tu Weiming, Guillaume Gronoff, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Ron Eglash, Marisol Wong-Villacrés, Xinrong Ren, François Blais, Ian Arawjo and Russell R. Dickerson and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association and interactions.

In The Last Decade

Daniel K. Gardner

21 papers receiving 153 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Daniel K. Gardner 142 48 35 28 23 31 225
Michael Saso 188 1.3× 76 1.6× 34 1.0× 32 1.1× 42 1.8× 28 307
Danièle Léger 201 1.4× 24 0.5× 53 1.5× 24 0.9× 9 0.4× 31 279
Ashon Crawley 124 0.9× 44 0.9× 23 0.7× 20 0.7× 17 0.7× 20 224
Philip M. Peek 94 0.7× 21 0.4× 28 0.8× 25 0.9× 25 1.1× 37 310
Pierre Maranda 83 0.6× 32 0.7× 12 0.3× 33 1.2× 23 1.0× 36 269
David S. Nivison 227 1.6× 76 1.6× 53 1.5× 15 0.5× 30 1.3× 33 311
Edward Waters Hood 89 0.6× 79 1.6× 21 0.6× 20 0.7× 12 0.5× 27 215
Lucian Turcescu 161 1.1× 20 0.4× 65 1.9× 24 0.9× 23 1.0× 25 238
Paul Jay 109 0.8× 41 0.9× 26 0.7× 44 1.6× 9 0.4× 27 295
Philip Yampolsky 176 1.2× 88 1.8× 42 1.2× 35 1.3× 23 1.0× 28 295

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel K. Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel K. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel K. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel K. Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel K. Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel K. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel K. Gardner. The network helps show where Daniel K. Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel K. Gardner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel K. Gardner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel K. Gardner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel K. Gardner. Daniel K. Gardner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026