John M. Taylor

619 total citations
14 papers, 413 citations indexed

About

John M. Taylor is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Taylor has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 413 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in John M. Taylor's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). John M. Taylor is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). John M. Taylor collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Spain. John M. Taylor's co-authors include Ronald B. Margolis, Margaret W. Bultas, Karen S. Moore, Herbert I. Goldman, Christi Bergin, John Leavitt, Kristopher M. Goodrich, Ashley J. Blount and J Gerlach and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Assessment, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Infant Behavior and Development.

In The Last Decade

John M. Taylor

12 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

John M. Taylor
Abiola O. Keller United States
Antje Kullowatz United States
Melba C. Stetz United States
Andrew S. Moriarty United Kingdom
Julie Lutz United States
Abiola O. Keller United States
John M. Taylor
Citations per year, relative to John M. Taylor John M. Taylor (= 1×) peers Abiola O. Keller

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Taylor. The network helps show where John M. Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Taylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Taylor. John M. Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Goodrich, Kristopher M., et al.. (2021). Standards of Care for Research in Group Work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 46(3). 244–255. 1 indexed citations
2.
Moore, Karen S., et al.. (2021). Nursing Professionals’ Stress Level During Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Looming Workforce Issue. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 17(6). 702–706. 21 indexed citations
3.
Taylor, John M.. (2021). Reliability. Journal of Nursing Education. 60(2). 65–66. 3 indexed citations
4.
Taylor, John M.. (2020). Overview and Illustration of Bayesian Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Ordinal Indicators. Practical assessment, research & evaluation. 24(1). 4. 6 indexed citations
5.
Taylor, John M. & Christi Bergin. (2019). The parent/caregiver involvement scale – Short form is a valid measure of parenting quality in high-risk families. Infant Behavior and Development. 54. 66–79. 3 indexed citations
6.
Taylor, John M.. (2019). Structural validity of the Parenting Daily Hassles Intensity Scale. Stress and Health. 35(2). 176–186. 9 indexed citations
7.
Bultas, Margaret W., et al.. (2015). Psychosocial Outcomes of Participating in Pediatric Diabetes Camp. Public Health Nursing. 33(4). 295–302. 25 indexed citations
8.
Taylor, John M.. (2014). Psychometric analysis of the Ten-Item Perceived Stress Scale.. Psychological Assessment. 27(1). 90–101. 305 indexed citations
9.
Taylor, John M.. (1990). Editorial. The wider world of computing and control. Computing & Control Engineering Journal. 1(1). 2–2.
10.
Margolis, Ronald B., et al.. (1986). A cross-validation of two short forms of the WAIS-R in a geriatric sample suspected of dementia. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 42(1). 145–146. 24 indexed citations
11.
Margolis, Ronald B., et al.. (1985). Parallel-Form Reliability of the Wechsler Memory Scale in a Geriatric Population With Suspected Dementia. The Journal of Psychology. 119(1). 81–85. 8 indexed citations
12.
Margolis, Ronald B., et al.. (1985). Parallel-Form Reliability of the Wechsler Memory Scale in a Geriatric Population With Suspected Dementia. The Journal of Psychology. 119(1). 81–85. 1 indexed citations
13.
Margolis, Ronald B., et al.. (1985). Relationship between the WAIS-R and the WRAT in a Geriatric Sample with Suspected Dementia. Psychological Reports. 56(1). 287–292.
14.
Taylor, John M., et al.. (1984). Limitations of the brief form of the halstead category test. PubMed. 6(3). 341–344. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026