John M. Steadman
Impact in
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Leonard BarkanRoland Mushat FryeJames A. FreemanThomas N. CornsMichael WildingJonathan GoldbergNorman FoersterDaniel Brewer
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (12 papers)Comparative Literature (10 papers)Notes and Queries (6 papers)Journal of the History of Ideas (3 papers)PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSan MarinoUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John M. Steadman
50 papers receiving 180 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Classics 72
- Literature and Literary Theory 90
- History 76
- Anthropology 52
- Philosophy 51
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Steadman
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Steadman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Steadman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Steadman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Steadman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Steadman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Steadman. The network helps show where John M. Steadman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 13 scholars most cited alongside John M. Steadman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Renaissance Fun: The machines behind the scenes | 2021 | 0 |
| 2 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 3 | Redefining a Period Style: Renaissance, Mannerist and Baroque in Literature | 1990 | 4 |
| 4 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 6 | Milton's Biblical and classical imagery | 1984 | 3 |
| 7 | 1981 | 12 | |
| 8 | Nature into myth: Medieval and Renaissance moral symbols | 1978 | 3 |
| 9 | 1973 | 7 | |
| 10 | The myth of Asia | 1969 | 36 |
| 11 | 1965 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1960 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1959 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1959 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1958 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1958 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1957 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1956 | 0 |
About John M. Steadman
John M. Steadman is a scholar working on Classics, History, Philosophy, Anthropology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 80 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (9 papers), Medieval Literature and History (8 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (4 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (72 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (90 citations), History (76 citations), Anthropology (52 citations) and Philosophy (51 citations). John M. Steadman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, San Marino and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Leonard Barkan, Roland Mushat Frye, James A. Freeman, Thomas N. Corns, Michael Wilding, Jonathan Goldberg, Norman Foerster, Daniel Brewer, C. A. Patrides and Aldo Scaglione. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Comparative Literature, Notes and Queries, Journal of the History of Ideas and PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.