Nancy L. Roelker
- History top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Topics
- European Political History Analysis (10 papers)Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (9 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (8 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewThe Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryHispanic American Historical Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nancy L. Roelker
15 papers receiving 221 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- History 158
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Political Science and International Relations 102
- Anthropology 80
- Economics and Econometrics 48
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy L. Roelker
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy L. Roelker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy L. Roelker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy L. Roelker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy L. Roelker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy L. Roelker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy L. Roelker. The network helps show where Nancy L. Roelker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy L. Roelker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy L. Roelker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy L. Roelker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy L. Roelker. Nancy L. Roelker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Fiction in the Archives: Pardon Tales and their Tellers in Sixteenth-Century Francebreakdown → | 286 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | From Wilson to Roosevelt : foreign policy of the United States, 1913-1945 | 2 |
| 19 | The Paris of Henry of Navarre | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Nancy L. Roelker
Nancy L. Roelker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History and Classics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Political History Analysis (10 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (9 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (158 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (44 citations) and Anthropology (80 citations). Nancy L. Roelker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Natalie Zemon Davis, David Buisseret and Raymond A. Mentzer. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Hispanic American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.