John M. Ryder
Impact in
- Aquatic Science top 1%
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Animal Science and Zoology top 1%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 6
-
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth 4
- Co-authors
- R.M.G. WellsJohn CarragherTim E. LoweGraham C. FletcherDavid H. BuissonJohn J. BaldwinRichard SeelyeJohn D. Baldwin
- Journals
- Journal of Food Science (4 papers)Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1 paper)International Journal of Food Science & Technology (1 paper)Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference (1 paper)Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandIndiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
John M. Ryder
10 papers receiving 605 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Aquatic Science 304
- Animal Science and Zoology 413
- Physiology 23
- Immunology 102
- Ecology 117
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Ryder
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Ryder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Ryder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Ryder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Ryder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Ryder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Ryder. The network helps show where John M. Ryder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside John M. Ryder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 3 | Tauropine and D-lactate as indicators of recovery of live paua (New Zealand abalone) (Haliotis iris) from handling stress, and of postmortem quality | 1994 | 18 |
| 4 | 1993 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 124 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 49 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 333 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 65 |
About John M. Ryder
John M. Ryder is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nutrition and Dietetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 10 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (4 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (3 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1 paper), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (1 paper) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (304 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (413 citations), Physiology (23 citations), Immunology (102 citations) and Ecology (117 citations). John M. Ryder has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include R.M.G. Wells, John Carragher, Tim E. Lowe, Graham C. Fletcher, David H. Buisson, John J. Baldwin, Richard Seelye, John D. Baldwin, Bruce R. Burns and Nick Waipara. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Food Science, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, International Journal of Food Science & Technology, Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference and Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.