Countries citing papers authored by John M. Braxton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Braxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Braxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Braxton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Braxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Braxton. The network helps show where John M. Braxton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Braxton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Braxton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Braxton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Braxton. John M. Braxton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Braxton, John M., et al.. (2020). Toward an Institutional Databases Audit to Improve College Student Persistence.. 8(1). 3–20.1 indexed citations
9.
Braxton, John M. & Don Hossler. (2019). Developing the Two-Way Practitioner-Researcher Loop for Enrollment Management.. 7(2). 7–12.1 indexed citations
10.
Wilson, Maureen E., Amy S. Hirschy, & John M. Braxton. (2016). Admonitory Behavioral Norms of Campus Housing and Residence Life Professionals. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 43(1). 44.1 indexed citations
11.
Braxton, John M. & Nathaniel J. Bray. (2013). Codes of conduct in academia. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 20(160).
12.
Braxton, John M.. (2012). Make mentorship matter. Nature. 487(7406). 165–166.2 indexed citations
13.
Braxton, John M.. (2006). Analyzing faculty work and rewards : using Boyer's four domains of scholarship. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).7 indexed citations
Bray, Nathaniel J., et al.. (1999). The influence of stress-related coping strategies on college student departure decisions.. Journal of college student development. 40(6).40 indexed citations
16.
Conrad, Clifton F., et al.. (1997). Factors Contributing to the Matriculation of White Students in Public HBCUs.. 3(1). 37–62.31 indexed citations
17.
Eyler, Janet, Dwight E. Giles, & John M. Braxton. (1997). The Impact of Service-Learning on College Students. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 4(1). 5–15.255 indexed citations
18.
Pascarella, Ernest T., Marcia Edison, Amaury Nora, Linda Serra Hagedorn, & John M. Braxton. (1996). Effects of Teacher Organization/Preparation and Teacher Skill/Clarity on General Cognitive Skills in College.. Journal of college student development. 37(1). 7–19.49 indexed citations
19.
Braxton, John M.. (1991). Peer Groups of Colleges and Universities Based on Student Outcomes.. Journal of college student development. 32(4).3 indexed citations
20.
Braxton, John M.. (1988). Causal Modeling and Path Analysis: An Introduction and an Illustration in Student Attrition Research.. Journal of college student development. 29(3).26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.