John M. Braxton

6.7k total citations
160 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

John M. Braxton is a scholar working on Education, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Braxton has authored 160 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 94 papers in Education, 26 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 25 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in John M. Braxton's work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (53 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (48 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (21 papers). John M. Braxton is often cited by papers focused on Evaluation of Teaching Practices (53 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (48 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (21 papers). John M. Braxton collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Botswana. John M. Braxton's co-authors include Jeffrey F. Milem, Alan E. Bayer, Amy S. Hirschy, Joseph B. Berger, Dwight E. Giles, Janet Eyler, Willis A. Jones, Don Hossler, Nick Vesper and Nathaniel J. Bray and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Blood and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

In The Last Decade

John M. Braxton

147 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John M. Braxton United States 34 3.1k 740 496 485 463 160 4.1k
Paul D. Umbach United States 30 2.4k 0.8× 763 1.0× 590 1.2× 316 0.7× 478 1.0× 46 3.5k
John C. Weidman United States 14 2.1k 0.7× 526 0.7× 384 0.8× 339 0.7× 361 0.8× 54 2.9k
Gary R. Pike United States 37 3.1k 1.0× 864 1.2× 547 1.1× 380 0.8× 374 0.8× 110 4.1k
Jeffrey F. Milem United States 25 2.7k 0.9× 897 1.2× 947 1.9× 375 0.8× 480 1.0× 35 3.6k
Linda Serra Hagedorn United States 34 3.1k 1.0× 981 1.3× 840 1.7× 614 1.3× 473 1.0× 126 4.3k
Josipa Roksa United States 31 2.4k 0.8× 385 0.5× 946 1.9× 278 0.6× 362 0.8× 81 3.6k
Eric L. Dey United States 24 1.8k 0.6× 621 0.8× 899 1.8× 222 0.5× 438 0.9× 41 2.9k
Jillian Kinzie United States 22 2.9k 0.9× 647 0.9× 324 0.7× 375 0.8× 278 0.6× 74 3.6k
Alberto F. Cabrera United States 36 5.0k 1.6× 1.1k 1.5× 984 2.0× 774 1.6× 580 1.3× 91 6.0k
William G. Spady United States 20 2.3k 0.7× 406 0.5× 685 1.4× 282 0.6× 269 0.6× 54 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Braxton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Braxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Braxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Braxton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Braxton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Braxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Braxton. The network helps show where John M. Braxton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Braxton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Braxton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Braxton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Braxton. John M. Braxton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gansemer‐Topf, Ann M., et al.. (2024). Defining the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). New Directions for Student Services. 2024(185). 9–17. 2 indexed citations
2.
Braxton, John M., et al.. (2023). Codes of Conduct for Undergraduate Teaching in the Top-400 Universities on the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education. 15(2). 34–62.
3.
Bray, Nathaniel J., et al.. (2023). The Value of Articles Published in Journals Focused on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A Use of Citations and Altmetrics as Indicators of Value. Innovative Higher Education. 48(6). 1055–1070. 2 indexed citations
4.
Braxton, John M., et al.. (2022). Toward the Development of a Two-Way Loop of a Scholarship of Practice for Independent College and University Presidents. Innovative Higher Education. 47(6). 1043–1065.
5.
Braxton, John M., et al.. (2022). Wither or not the academic public intellectual across the spectrum of U.S. colleges and universities. New Directions for Higher Education. 2022(200). 11–24. 1 indexed citations
6.
Culver, K. C., John M. Braxton, & Ernest T. Pascarella. (2021). What We Talk about When We Talk about Rigor: Examining Conceptions of Academic Rigor. The Journal of Higher Education. 92(7). 1140–1163. 8 indexed citations
7.
Hankey, Kim G., Tim Luetkens, John C. McLenithan, et al.. (2021). Eight-Day Point of Care CAR T-Cell Manufacturing on Clinimacs Prodigy from Healthy Donors As a Proof-of-Concept Study. Blood. 138(Supplement 1). 2851–2851. 1 indexed citations
8.
Braxton, John M., et al.. (2020). Toward an Institutional Databases Audit to Improve College Student Persistence.. 8(1). 3–20. 1 indexed citations
9.
Braxton, John M. & Don Hossler. (2019). Developing the Two-Way Practitioner-Researcher Loop for Enrollment Management.. 7(2). 7–12. 1 indexed citations
10.
Wilson, Maureen E., Amy S. Hirschy, & John M. Braxton. (2016). Admonitory Behavioral Norms of Campus Housing and Residence Life Professionals. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 43(1). 44. 1 indexed citations
11.
Braxton, John M. & Nathaniel J. Bray. (2013). Codes of conduct in academia. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 20(160).
12.
Braxton, John M.. (2012). Make mentorship matter. Nature. 487(7406). 165–166. 2 indexed citations
13.
Braxton, John M.. (2006). Analyzing faculty work and rewards : using Boyer's four domains of scholarship. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 7 indexed citations
14.
Braxton, John M., et al.. (2002). Students as Tenuous Agents of Social Control of Professorial Misconduct. Peabody Journal of Education. 77(3). 101–124. 15 indexed citations
15.
Bray, Nathaniel J., et al.. (1999). The influence of stress-related coping strategies on college student departure decisions.. Journal of college student development. 40(6). 40 indexed citations
16.
Conrad, Clifton F., et al.. (1997). Factors Contributing to the Matriculation of White Students in Public HBCUs.. 3(1). 37–62. 31 indexed citations
17.
Eyler, Janet, Dwight E. Giles, & John M. Braxton. (1997). The Impact of Service-Learning on College Students. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 4(1). 5–15. 255 indexed citations
18.
Pascarella, Ernest T., Marcia Edison, Amaury Nora, Linda Serra Hagedorn, & John M. Braxton. (1996). Effects of Teacher Organization/Preparation and Teacher Skill/Clarity on General Cognitive Skills in College.. Journal of college student development. 37(1). 7–19. 49 indexed citations
19.
Braxton, John M.. (1991). Peer Groups of Colleges and Universities Based on Student Outcomes.. Journal of college student development. 32(4). 3 indexed citations
20.
Braxton, John M.. (1988). Causal Modeling and Path Analysis: An Introduction and an Illustration in Student Attrition Research.. Journal of college student development. 29(3). 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026