John Loxton

43 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

John Loxton
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Algebra and Number Theory 191
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 83
  • Theoretical Computer Science 18
  • Mathematical Physics 145
  • Geometry and Topology 124
Replace Douglas Hensley with:
Douglas Hensley United States
J. S. Hsia United States
Imre Kátai Hungary
Hans Peter Schlickewei Germany
R. R. Hall United Kingdom
S. W. Graham United States
Eduard Wirsing Germany
Ivan Matveevich Vinogradov
Robert Rumely United States
W. Dale Brownawell United States
John Loxton relative to Douglas Hensley United States Douglas Hensley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Douglas Hensley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Loxton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Loxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Loxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Loxton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Loxton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Loxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Loxton. The network helps show where John Loxton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John Loxton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Loxton Line = papers co-authored together John Loxton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197741
2 198529
3 198228
4 198721
5 198820
6 197720
7 197217
8 198217
9 198316
10 197714
11 197714
12 197714
13 197814
14 198313
15 198413
16 198611
17 197710
18 198510
19 19829
20 19928

About John Loxton

John Loxton is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Theoretical Computer Science and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytic Number Theory Research (19 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (11 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (7 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (5 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (5 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (4 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (3 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (191 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (83 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (18 citations), Mathematical Physics (145 citations) and Geometry and Topology (124 citations). John Loxton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. J. van der Poorten, Robert A. Smith, R. C. Vaughan, Hugh C. Williams, J. W. Sanders, Mohamad Rushdan Md. Said, Péter L. Erdős, Michael D. Hirschhorn, Graham Everest and Jennifer Seberry. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Arithmetica, Aequationes Mathematicae, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), Mathematika and Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact