Countries where authors publish in Aequationes Mathematicae
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Aequationes Mathematicae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aequationes Mathematicae more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae
This network shows the impact of papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae.
About Aequationes Mathematicae
The 2.8k papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae in the last decades have received a total of 22.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Aequationes Mathematicae usually cover Applied Mathematics (1.5k papers), Algebra and Number Theory (420 papers), Geometry and Topology (770 papers), Theoretical Computer Science (80 papers) and Mathematical Physics (645 papers) specifically the topics of Functional Equations Stability Results (1.0k papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (289 papers), Mathematics and Applications (265 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (206 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (179 papers), Mathematical Inequalities and Applications (151 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (151 papers) and Optimization and Variational Analysis (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Aequationes Mathematicae are Michael Frank, Bruno Buchberger, Gian Luigi Forti, Henrik Stetkær, Philippe G. Ciarlet, Jürg Rätz, J. Aczél, Janusz Brzdȩk, Zenon Moszner and Lech Maligranda.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.