Hugh C. Williams
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 10%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Renate ScheidlerJohannes BuchmannMichael J. JacobsonAndreas SteinAttila PethőLawrence C. WashingtonJohn LoxtonR. G. Stanton
- Topics
- Coding theory and cryptography (20 papers)Analytic Number Theory Research (10 papers)Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Hugh C. Williams
43 papers receiving 353 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Artificial Intelligence 244
- Geometry and Topology 175
- Algebra and Number Theory 132
- Information Systems 125
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 101
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh C. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh C. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh C. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh C. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh C. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh C. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh C. Williams. The network helps show where Hugh C. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh C. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh C. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh C. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh C. Williams. Hugh C. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | A CRT-Based Montgomery Multiplication for Finite Fields of Small Characteristic | 0 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Implementation of a key exchange protocol using real quadratic fields (extended abstract) | 1 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | A Key Exchange System Based on Real Quadratic Fields | 15 |
| 17 | Lecture notes in computer sciences; 218 on Advances in cryptology---CRYPTO 85 | 2 |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Hugh C. Williams
Hugh C. Williams is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Theoretical Computer Science and Geometry and Topology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coding theory and cryptography (20 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (10 papers) and Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (132 citations), Geometry and Topology (175 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (52 citations). Hugh C. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Renate Scheidler, Johannes Buchmann, Michael J. Jacobson, Andreas Stein, Attila Pethő, Michael J. Jacobson, Lawrence C. Washington, John Loxton, R. G. Stanton and Andrew Granville. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematics of Computation, Pediatric Research and Pacific Journal of Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.