John L. Ingraham
- Endocrinology top 0.5%
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 10
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 15
- Biochemical and Molecular Research 12
- Enzyme function and inhibition 8
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism 7
- Biotechnology top 0.5%
-
- Enzyme Structure and Function 15
-
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 9
-
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 8
- Co-authors
- Frederick C. NeidhardtAllen G. MarrMoselio SchaechterRoger Y. StanierCurtis A. CarlsonO. MaaløeAhmed T. AbdelalEnrique Cerdá‐Olmedo
- Journals
- Journal of Bacteriology (31 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (7 papers)American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
John L. Ingraham
94 papers receiving 8.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
- Endocrinology 534
- Genetics 2.4k
- Molecular Biology 5.6k
- Biochemistry 556
- Biotechnology 570
Countries citing papers authored by John L. Ingraham
This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Ingraham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Ingraham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Ingraham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Ingraham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Ingraham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Ingraham. The network helps show where John L. Ingraham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John L. Ingraham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 2 | Physiology of the bacterial cell : a molecular approachbreakdown → | 1990 | 680 |
| 3 | 1989 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1978 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1978 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 59 | |
| 12 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1971 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1961 | 29 | |
| 15 | 1961 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1961 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1960 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1960 | 63 | |
| 19 | 1960 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1960 | 24 |
About John L. Ingraham
John L. Ingraham is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 95 papers that have together received 8.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Structure and Function (15 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (15 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (12 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (10 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (9 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (8 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (8 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (534 citations), Genetics (2.4k citations) and Molecular Biology (5.6k citations). John L. Ingraham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Frederick C. Neidhardt, Allen G. Marr, Moselio Schaechter, Roger Y. Stanier, Curtis A. Carlson, O. Maaløe, Ahmed T. Abdelal, Enrique Cerdá‐Olmedo, Maxwell K. Shaw and J. F. Guymon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, Archives of Microbiology and Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.