John K. Stokes
Impact in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Parasitic infections in humans and animals
- Surgery top 10%
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 14
-
- Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation 2
- Co-authors
- Eeric TruumeesMatthew J. GeckHyun W. BaeGregory A. HoffmanDaniel L. PetersonReginald J. DavisKee D. KimRalph F. Rashbaum
- Journals
- Spine Deformity (3 papers)Global Spine Journal (2 papers)Neurosurgical FOCUS (2 papers)Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques (2 papers)Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John K. Stokes
19 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 365
- Surgery 382
- Parasitology 12
- Biochemistry 10
- Health Informatics 2
Countries citing papers authored by John K. Stokes
This map shows the geographic impact of John K. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John K. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John K. Stokes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John K. Stokes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John K. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John K. Stokes. The network helps show where John K. Stokes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John K. Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 151 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 60 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 47 |
About John K. Stokes
John K. Stokes is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Internal Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (14 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (10 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (365 citations), Surgery (382 citations), Parasitology (12 citations), Biochemistry (10 citations) and Health Informatics (2 citations). John K. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eeric Truumees, Matthew J. Geck, Hyun W. Bae, Gregory A. Hoffman, Daniel L. Peterson, Reginald J. Davis, Kee D. Kim, Ralph F. Rashbaum, Michael S. Hisey and Steven E. Gaede. Their work appears in journals such as Spine Deformity, Global Spine Journal, Neurosurgical FOCUS, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques and Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.