Global Spine Journal

2.3k papers and 22.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Global Spine Journal in the last decades have received a total of 22.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Spine Journal usually cover Surgery (1.9k papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.6k papers) and Pharmacology (414 papers) specifically the topics of Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1.6k papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (1.1k papers) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (495 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Spine Journal are Joseph R. Dettori, Michael G. Fehlings, Samuel K. Cho, Jens R. Chapman, Daniel C. Norvell, Kevin Phan, Jun Kim, K. Daniel Riew, Paul M. Arnold and Lindsay Tetreault.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Spine Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Spine Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Spine Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Global Spine Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Spine Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Spine Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Spine Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025