Thomas E. Mroz

4.1k total citations
128 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Thomas E. Mroz is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas E. Mroz has authored 128 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 93 papers in Surgery, 83 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 31 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Thomas E. Mroz's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (80 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (52 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (30 papers). Thomas E. Mroz is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (80 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (52 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (30 papers). Thomas E. Mroz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Egypt. Thomas E. Mroz's co-authors include Michael P. Steinmetz, Edward C. Benzel, Isador H. Lieberman, Daniel Lubelski, Joseph E. Tanenbaum, Vincent J. Alentado, Jay M. Levin, Jeffrey C. Wang, Michael G. Fehlings and Jacob A. Miller and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Spine.

In The Last Decade

Thomas E. Mroz

119 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas E. Mroz United States 29 2.1k 1.7k 515 468 243 128 2.8k
Nicholas U. Ahn United States 29 1.7k 0.8× 1.3k 0.8× 780 1.5× 156 0.3× 349 1.4× 137 2.6k
Mohammed Ali Alvi United States 25 1.6k 0.7× 1.4k 0.8× 418 0.8× 208 0.4× 168 0.7× 180 2.5k
John A. Bendo United States 31 1.9k 0.9× 1.6k 0.9× 564 1.1× 343 0.7× 252 1.0× 83 2.5k
Ahmad Nassr United States 28 2.5k 1.2× 1.8k 1.0× 221 0.4× 357 0.8× 117 0.5× 189 3.0k
Nader S. Dahdaleh United States 31 2.2k 1.1× 1.5k 0.9× 195 0.4× 254 0.5× 228 0.9× 175 3.0k
Kris E. Radcliff United States 39 4.2k 2.0× 3.4k 2.0× 1.0k 2.0× 347 0.7× 299 1.2× 210 5.2k
Michael W. Groff United States 39 3.4k 1.6× 3.1k 1.8× 865 1.7× 445 1.0× 215 0.9× 116 4.2k
David H. Kim United States 33 3.0k 1.4× 1.4k 0.8× 731 1.4× 374 0.8× 267 1.1× 107 4.0k
Sheeraz A. Qureshi United States 39 4.2k 2.0× 3.6k 2.1× 1.1k 2.1× 718 1.5× 342 1.4× 347 5.5k
Uri M. Ahn United States 27 1.5k 0.7× 935 0.5× 626 1.2× 135 0.3× 332 1.4× 83 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Mroz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Mroz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Mroz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Mroz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Mroz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Mroz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Mroz. The network helps show where Thomas E. Mroz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas E. Mroz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas E. Mroz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas E. Mroz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas E. Mroz. Thomas E. Mroz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Steinmetz, Michael P., et al.. (2023). Surgical classification using natural language processing of informed consent forms in spine surgery. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 54(6). E10–E10. 6 indexed citations
3.
Rajan, Prashant V., Thomas E. Mroz, Michael P. Steinmetz, et al.. (2023). Leveraging published randomized controlled trials to inform clinical trial design: a simulation-based study of laminectomy versus laminectomy and fusion. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine. 38(6). 696–704. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gaudiani, Michael A., et al.. (2021). The association of preoperative TNF-alpha inhibitor use and reoperation rates in spinal fusion surgery. The Spine Journal. 21(6). 972–979. 6 indexed citations
5.
King, Dominic, Ahmed K. Emara, Mitchell K. Ng, et al.. (2020). Transformation from a traditional model to a virtual model of care in orthopaedic surgery. Bone & Joint Open. 1(6). 272–280. 24 indexed citations
6.
King, Dominic, Ahmed K. Emara, Mitchell K. Ng, et al.. (2020). Transformation from a traditional model to a virtual model of care in orthopaedic surgery. Bone & Joint Open. 1(6). 272–280. 18 indexed citations
7.
Miller, Jacob A., et al.. (2019). Predictors of favorable quality of life outcome following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine. 31(3). 389–396. 9 indexed citations
8.
Blackburn, Collin W., et al.. (2019). Association of Cost Savings and Surgical Quality With Single-Vendor Procurement for Spinal Implants. JAMA Network Open. 2(11). e1915567–e1915567. 16 indexed citations
9.
Mroz, Thomas E., et al.. (2019). Surface Technologies in Spinal Fusion. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 31(1). 57–64. 20 indexed citations
10.
Levin, Jay M., Joseph E. Tanenbaum, Michael P. Steinmetz, Thomas E. Mroz, & Samuel C. Overley. (2018). Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Spine Journal. 18(6). 1088–1098. 68 indexed citations
11.
Choma, Theodore J., Thomas E. Mroz, Christina L. Goldstein, Paul M. Arnold, & Mohammed F. Shamji. (2017). Emerging Techniques in Degenerative Thoracolumbar Surgery. Neurosurgery. 80(3S). S55–S60. 5 indexed citations
12.
Peterson, Jeremy, Paul M. Arnold, Zachary A. Smith, et al.. (2017). Misplaced Cervical Screws Requiring Reoperation. Global Spine Journal. 7(1_suppl). 46S–52S. 2 indexed citations
13.
Tanenbaum, Joseph E., Kevin Phan, Vincent J. Alentado, et al.. (2016). Decompression surgery for spinal metastases: a systematic review. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 41(2). E2–E2. 70 indexed citations
14.
Tanenbaum, Joseph E., Vincent J. Alentado, Jacob A. Miller, et al.. (2016). Association between insurance status and patient safety in the lumbar spine fusion population. The Spine Journal. 17(3). 338–345. 25 indexed citations
15.
Alentado, Vincent J., et al.. (2016). Independent predictors of a clinically significant improvement after lumbar fusion surgery. The Spine Journal. 17(2). 236–243. 39 indexed citations
16.
Shriver, Michael F., et al.. (2015). Lumbar microdiscectomy complication rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 39(4). E6–E6. 108 indexed citations
17.
Shriver, Michael F., et al.. (2015). Lumbar spine surgery positioning complications: a systematic review. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 39(4). E16–E16. 34 indexed citations
18.
Fehlings, Michael G., Anick Nater, Jens R. Chapman, James S. Harrop, & Thomas E. Mroz. (2014). Consensus Statement. Spine. 39(22 Suppl 1). S3–S6. 2 indexed citations
19.
20.
Steinmetz, Michael P., Thomas E. Mroz, Ajit A. Krishnaney, & Michael T. Modic. (2009). Conventional versus digital radiographs for intraoperative cervical spine-level localization: a prospective time and cost analysis. The Spine Journal. 9(12). 967–971. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026