William Oxner

1.1k citations
18 papers · 281 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Oxner

16 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

William Oxner
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 169
  • Pharmacology 66
  • Surgery 100
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 13
  • Emergency Medical Services 5
Replace Tadanori Sakamaki with:
Tadanori Sakamaki Japan
Carlo Formica Italy
Gwen Holsapple United States
Taylor Burnham United States
Armando Alpízar-Aguirre Mexico
Paul Khoueir United States
Hanna Mass United States
Akiyoshi Masuda Japan
David G. Malone United States
William Oxner relative to Tadanori Sakamaki Japan Tadanori Sakamaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tadanori Sakamaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Oxner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Oxner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Oxner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Oxner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Oxner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Oxner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Oxner. The network helps show where William Oxner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Oxner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Oxner Line = papers co-authored together William Oxner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201463
2 200656
3 200539
4 201127
5 201721
6 201817
7 200717
8 201511
9 20219
10 20207
11 20236
12 20102
13 20222
14 19892
15 20231
16 20101
17 20220
18 20200

About William Oxner

William Oxner is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pharmacology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (1 paper), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (1 paper) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (169 citations), Pharmacology (66 citations), Surgery (100 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (13 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (5 citations). William Oxner has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include James D. Kang, Lars G. Gilbertson, Christian Lattermann, Paul D. Robbins, David Alexander, Albert Yee, Andrew Glennie, Eugene K. Wai, Marcel F. Dvorak and Joel Finkelstein. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Journal of surgical education, Medicine, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research and Canadian Journal of Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact