Thomas E. Mroz

4.2k total citations
120 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Thomas E. Mroz is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas E. Mroz has authored 120 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 105 papers in Surgery, 96 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 15 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Thomas E. Mroz's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (96 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (70 papers) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (60 papers). Thomas E. Mroz is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (96 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (70 papers) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (60 papers). Thomas E. Mroz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Egypt. Thomas E. Mroz's co-authors include Edward C. Benzel, Michael P. Steinmetz, Daniel Lubelski, Kalil G. Abdullah, Matthew D. Alvin, Jacob A. Miller, Benjamin P. Rosenbaum, Jeffrey C. Wang, Daniel C. Norvell and Michael F. Shriver and has published in prestigious journals such as Spine, Neurosurgery and European Spine Journal.

In The Last Decade

Thomas E. Mroz

116 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas E. Mroz United States 31 2.4k 2.1k 362 241 99 120 2.8k
John E. OʼToole United States 26 2.1k 0.9× 1.8k 0.8× 431 1.2× 235 1.0× 66 0.7× 105 2.6k
Zorica Buser United States 26 1.8k 0.7× 1.4k 0.7× 502 1.4× 310 1.3× 115 1.2× 198 2.3k
Charles H. Crawford United States 28 1.9k 0.8× 1.4k 0.6× 234 0.6× 150 0.6× 72 0.7× 117 2.3k
John A. Bendo United States 31 1.9k 0.8× 1.6k 0.7× 564 1.6× 343 1.4× 197 2.0× 83 2.5k
Michael D. Daubs United States 32 2.9k 1.2× 2.6k 1.2× 584 1.6× 363 1.5× 76 0.8× 77 3.4k
Shane Burch United States 33 2.5k 1.0× 1.8k 0.8× 259 0.7× 433 1.8× 123 1.2× 110 3.1k
Wilco Jacobs Netherlands 37 2.6k 1.1× 2.1k 1.0× 1.5k 4.0× 367 1.5× 44 0.4× 87 3.5k
Vincent Arlet United States 32 3.5k 1.5× 2.3k 1.1× 188 0.5× 206 0.9× 85 0.9× 126 3.8k
John C. France United States 26 1.7k 0.7× 1.2k 0.5× 274 0.8× 220 0.9× 28 0.3× 70 2.1k
Jacob M. Buchowski United States 41 5.4k 2.3× 4.3k 2.0× 683 1.9× 303 1.3× 117 1.2× 165 6.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Mroz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Mroz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Mroz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Mroz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Mroz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Mroz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Mroz. The network helps show where Thomas E. Mroz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas E. Mroz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas E. Mroz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas E. Mroz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas E. Mroz. Thomas E. Mroz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
3.
Pennington, Zach, Marco Swanson, Daniel Lubelski, et al.. (2020). Comparing the short-term cost-effectiveness of epidural steroid injections and medical management alone for discogenic lumbar radiculopathy. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 191. 105675–105675. 4 indexed citations
4.
Pennington, Zach, et al.. (2020). Preoperative Hyponatremia and Perioperative Complications in Cervical Spinal Fusion. World Neurosurgery. 141. e864–e872. 4 indexed citations
5.
Truumees, Eeric, Devender Singh, William F. Lavelle, et al.. (2020). Is it safe to stop at C7 during multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion? – multicenter analysis. The Spine Journal. 21(1). 90–95. 14 indexed citations
6.
Pennington, Zach, Vikram A. Mehta, Daniel Lubelski, et al.. (2019). Quality of Life and Cost Implications of Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and its Subsequent Revision Surgery. World Neurosurgery. 133. e592–e599. 30 indexed citations
7.
Xu, Jordan, Michael F. Shriver, Joseph E. Tanenbaum, et al.. (2017). Adverse Events Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Global Spine Journal. 8(2). 178–189. 13 indexed citations
8.
Miller, Jacob A., et al.. (2015). The impact of diabetes upon quality of life outcomes after lumbar decompression. The Spine Journal. 16(6). 714–721. 19 indexed citations
9.
Alvin, Matthew D., Jacob A. Miller, Daniel Lubelski, et al.. (2014). Variations in cost calculations in spine surgery cost-effectiveness research. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 36(6). E1–E1. 63 indexed citations
10.
Lubelski, Daniel, Andrew T. Healy, Matthew D. Alvin, et al.. (2014). Association of postoperative outcomes with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis and cervical stenosis. The Spine Journal. 15(1). 18–24. 2 indexed citations
11.
Alvin, Matthew D., Jacob A. Miller, Swetha J. Sundar, et al.. (2014). The impact of preoperative depression on quality of life outcomes after posterior cervical fusion. The Spine Journal. 15(1). 79–85. 47 indexed citations
12.
Alvin, Matthew D., Sheeraz A. Qureshi, Eric O. Klineberg, et al.. (2014). Cervical Degenerative Disease. Spine. 39(22 Suppl 1). S53–S64. 27 indexed citations
13.
Alvin, Matthew D., Daniel Lubelski, Benjamin D. Kuhns, et al.. (2014). Cervical arthroplasty: a critical review of the literature. The Spine Journal. 14(9). 2231–2245. 46 indexed citations
14.
Alvin, Matthew D., Adeeb Derakhshan, Daniel Lubelski, et al.. (2014). Cost-Utility Analysis of 1- and 2-Level Dorsal Lumbar Fusions With and Without Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 at 1-Year Follow-Up. Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication. 29(1). E28–E33. 17 indexed citations
15.
Mroz, Thomas E. & Matthew D. Alvin. (2014). The Mobi-C cervical disc for one-level and two-level cervical disc replacement: a review of the literature. Medical Devices Evidence and Research. 7. 397–397. 23 indexed citations
16.
Lubelski, Daniel, Matthew D. Alvin, Nilgün Şenol, et al.. (2014). Quality of life outcomes following surgery for patients with coexistent cervical stenosis and multiple sclerosis. European Spine Journal. 23(8). 1699–1704. 8 indexed citations
17.
Lubelski, Daniel, Kalil G. Abdullah, Thomas E. Mroz, et al.. (2012). Lateral Extracavitary vs Costotransversectomy Approaches to the Thoracic Spine. Neurosurgery. 71(6). 1096–1102. 14 indexed citations
19.
Rajpal, Sharad, Roy Hwang, Thomas E. Mroz, & Michael P. Steinmetz. (2011). Comparing Vertebral Body Reconstruction Implants for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Metastatic Spinal Tumors. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 25(2). 85–91. 16 indexed citations
20.
Abdullah, Kalil G., Michael P. Steinmetz, & Thomas E. Mroz. (2009). Morphometric and Volumetric Analysis of the Lateral Masses of the Lower Cervical Spine. Spine. 34(14). 1476–1479. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026