John Ingham

5.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
34 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

John Ingham is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, John Ingham has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Anthropology and 4 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in John Ingham's work include Latin American history and culture (4 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers). John Ingham is often cited by papers focused on Latin American history and culture (4 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers). John Ingham collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. John Ingham's co-authors include Pierre Collerette, Paul Legris, Irving J. Dunn, Elmar Heinzle, Jean Cadieux, Jiří E. Přenosil, Isao Komasawa, Hafid Agourram, Penélope Harvey and M. J. Sallnow and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Engineering Science, Information & Management and American Anthropologist.

In The Last Decade

John Ingham

32 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model

2002 2.9k citations Paul Legris, John Ingham et al. Information & Management profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Ingham United States	12	2.1k	1.4k	422	410	406	34	3.5k
Paul Legris Canada	3	2.0k 1.0×	1.3k 0.9×	395 0.9×	400 1.0×	351 0.9×	5	3.0k
Kenneth A. Kozar United States	19	1.7k 0.8×	1.3k 0.9×	426 1.0×	401 1.0×	534 1.3×	36	3.5k
Pierre Collerette Canada	8	2.0k 1.0×	1.3k 0.9×	450 1.1×	400 1.0×	352 0.9×	22	3.1k
Ming-Chi Lee Taiwan	6	1.9k 0.9×	1.4k 1.0×	497 1.2×	237 0.6×	570 1.4×	17	3.1k
Hock Chuan Chan Singapore	23	2.0k 1.0×	1.9k 1.3×	597 1.4×	495 1.2×	770 1.9×	106	3.9k
Younghwa Lee United States	17	1.9k 0.9×	1.6k 1.1×	478 1.1×	386 0.9×	511 1.3×	23	3.5k
Kieran Mathieson United States	9	3.0k 1.4×	2.1k 1.5×	856 2.0×	718 1.8×	636 1.6×	27	4.3k
Kai R. Larsen United States	23	1.4k 0.7×	1.3k 0.9×	296 0.7×	436 1.1×	306 0.8×	81	3.4k
Louis G. Tornatzky United States	12	1.8k 0.8×	943 0.7×	381 0.9×	325 0.8×	442 1.1×	39	3.7k
John D’Ambra Australia	26	936 0.4×	915 0.7×	532 1.3×	369 0.9×	391 1.0×	69	2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by John Ingham

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Ingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ingham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Ingham

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ingham. The network helps show where John Ingham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Ingham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Ingham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Ingham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Ingham. John Ingham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

White, Graham, John Ingham, Mark Law, & Alessandra Russo. (2019). Using an ASG Based Generative Policy to Model Human Rules. 99–103. 1 indexed citations

2.

Ingham, John & Jean Cadieux. (2016). From E-Shopping System Quality to the Consumer's Intention to Return: A Meta-Analytic Study of the Mediation of Attitude, Usefulness, Enjoyment, and Trust. 3556–3564. 9 indexed citations

3.

Mathieu, Anne, et al.. (2009). Expanding Sales Coaching Research Through System Dynamics’ and Sciences of Complexity's Perspectives. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

4.

Ingham, John. (2007). Matricidal Madness in Foucault's Anthropology: The Pierre Rivière Seminar. Ethos. 35(2). 130–158.

5.

Agourram, Hafid & John Ingham. (2007). The impact of national culture on the meaning of information system success at the user level. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 20(6). 641–656. 17 indexed citations

6.

Ingham, John. (2007). Simplicity and complexity in anthropology. On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures. 15(1). 7–14. 2 indexed citations

7.

Ingham, John, et al.. (2005). SENSUAL ATTACHMENT AND INCEST AVOIDANCE IN HUMAN EVOLUTION AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 11(4). 677–701. 11 indexed citations

8.

Dunn, Irving J., Elmar Heinzle, John Ingham, & Jiří E. Přenosil. (2003). Biological Reaction Engineering. 70 indexed citations

9.

Ingham, John. (2002). Primal Scene and Misreading in Nabokov's Lolita. American imago. 59(1). 27–52. 3 indexed citations

10.

Legris, Paul, John Ingham, & Pierre Collerette. (2002). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management. 40(3). 191–204. 2918 indexed citations breakdown →

11.

Ingham, John, Irving J. Dunn, & Elmar Heinzle. (2000). Chemical Engineering Dynamics: Modelling with PC Stimulation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks. 21 indexed citations

12.

Ingham, John, Irving J. Dunn, Elmar Heinzle, & Jiří E. Přenosil. (2000). Chemical Engineering Dynamics. 49 indexed citations

13.

Ingham, John. (1998). Corn Fests and Water Carnivals: Celebrating Community in Minnesota. American Anthropologist. 100(2). 585–586. 3 indexed citations

14.

Ingham, John. (1996). Oedipality in Pragmatic Discourse: The Trobriands and Hindu India. Ethos. 24(4). 559–587. 3 indexed citations

15.

Dunn, Irving J., et al.. (1995). Dynamics of Environmental Bioprocesses. 16 indexed citations

16.

Dunn, I. J., et al.. (1988). Application of digital simulation languages with personal computers in chemical and biochemical engineering education. Chemical Engineering Science. 43(8). 1897–1902. 2 indexed citations

17.

Ingham, John, et al.. (1985). Computer-aided structure synthesis of metal extraction processes.. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN. 18(4). 303–307. 5 indexed citations

18.

Komasawa, Isao & John Ingham. (1978). Effect of system properties on the performance of liquid—liquid extraction columns—III Mass transfer characteristics: Systems toluene—acetone—w. Chemical Engineering Science. 33(5). 541–546. 8 indexed citations

19.

Ingham, John. (1971). Time and Space in Ancient Mexico: The Symbolic Dimensions of Clanship. Man. 6(4). 615–615. 9 indexed citations

20.

Ingham, John. (1970). The Asymmetrical Implications of Godparenthood in Tlayacapan, Morelos. Man. 5(2). 281–281. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact