John Howe

932 citations
45 papers · 282 indexed · h-index 11

John Howe

37 papers receiving 182 citations

Peers

John Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Classics 47
  • History 67
  • Political Science and International Relations 124
  • Marketing 37
  • Religious studies 12
Replace James B. McSwain with:
James B. McSwain United States
Bruce Gordon United States
Buchanan Sharp United States
George Miles United States
G. V. Scammell United Kingdom
Mavis Mate United States
Ralph Houlbrooke United Kingdom
S. F. C. Milsom United States
A. J. Pollard United Kingdom
R. C. van Caenegem Belgium
John Howe relative to James B. McSwain United States James B. McSwain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
James B. McSwain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Howe. The network helps show where John Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Howe Line = papers co-authored together John Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20169
2
The Intervals of Cinema
20146
3
Study on labour inspection sanctions and remedies : the case of Australia
20111
4
The works of John Howe, M. A
20101
5 20102
6
Biblioteca agiografica italiana (BAI): Repertorio di testi e manoscritti, secoli XIII-XV
20050
7 20011
8
99.08.08, Cushing, Papacy and Law in the Gregorian Revolution
19991
9 19973
10 19970
11 19972
12 198813
13 19871
14 19870
15 19861
16 198612
17 198016
18 19791
19 19781
20 19642

About John Howe

John Howe is a scholar working on Classics, History, Political Science and International Relations, Religious studies and Marketing, having authored 45 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (13 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (9 papers), Medieval Literature and History (7 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (7 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (2 papers) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (47 citations), History (67 citations), Political Science and International Relations (124 citations), Marketing (37 citations) and Religious studies (12 citations). John Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Patrick Diggins, Richard L. Bushman, Stephen G. Kurtz, A. D. Wright, Jacques Rancière, Lance Banning, Richard Buel, Marc Augé, Sean Cooney and Paul C. Nagel. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The William and Mary Quarterly, Journal of American History, The Science of The Total Environment and The Journal of Southern History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026