George Miles

648 citations
27 papers · 219 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Archaeology and Historical Studies (12 papers)Islamic Studies and History (4 papers)Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (4 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

George Miles

19 papers receiving 116 citations

Peers

George Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Sociology and Political Science 69
  • Political Science and International Relations 61
  • Anthropology 58
  • Archeology 55
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 28
Replace Robert Blair St. George with:
Robert Blair St. George United States
William J. Eccles United States
G. V. Scammell United Kingdom
Lois Green Carr Canada
Patricia E. Rubertone United States
J. M. S. Careless Canada
Robert Detweiler United States
George T. Scanlon
John Huxtable Elliott
Ian Campbell United States
George Miles relative to Robert Blair St. George United States Robert Blair St. George's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Robert Blair St. George · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Miles. The network helps show where George Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Miles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Miles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Miles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Miles. George Miles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
The excavation at Herodian Jericho, 1951 : conducted by the American Schools of Oriental Research in Jerusalem
0
2 21
3 44
4 0
5 0
6 11
7 2
8
A Brief Study of Joseph Brant's Political Career in Relation to Iroquois Political Structure.
1
9 1
10
Home dialysis: its costs and problems.
8
11 3
12 1
13 2
14 2
15 1
16 3
17 8
18 14
19 2
20 12

About George Miles

George Miles is a scholar working on Archeology, Classics and Anthropology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (12 papers), Islamic Studies and History (4 papers) and Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (58 citations), Archeology (55 citations) and Classics (16 citations). George Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Cronon, Robert F. Berkhofer, H. A. R. Gibb, Stanford J. Shaw, William R. Polk, Lewis L. Gould, Bertold Spuler, Angus Rae, Richard W. Etulain and Donald Worster. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and Geographical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026