John Hoeks

4.6k total citations
80 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

John Hoeks is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, John Hoeks has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 15 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in John Hoeks's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (28 papers), Media Influence and Health (13 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers). John Hoeks is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (28 papers), Media Influence and Health (13 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers). John Hoeks collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, South Africa and Portugal. John Hoeks's co-authors include Laurie A. Stowe, Harm Brouwer, Hartmut Fitz, Petra Hendriks, Gisela Redeker, Carel Jansen, Matthew W. Crocker, Noortje J. Venhuizen, P.E. Treffers and Janna G. Koppe and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and PEDIATRICS.

In The Last Decade

John Hoeks

77 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Hoeks Netherlands	23	1.5k	1.0k	731	403	379	80	2.8k
Martin Doherty United Kingdom	31	708 0.5×	953 0.9×	408 0.6×	62 0.2×	104 0.3×	77	2.7k
Xuyang Zhang China	27	2.1k 1.4×	5.2k 5.1×	312 0.4×	86 0.2×	142 0.4×	109	6.8k
Michael J. A. Howe United Kingdom	27	910 0.6×	769 0.7×	631 0.9×	108 0.3×	57 0.2×	93	3.1k
Marios N. Avraamides Cyprus	22	497 0.3×	286 0.3×	398 0.5×	180 0.4×	14 0.0×	83	1.7k
Joseph R. Jenkins United States	46	727 0.5×	5.0k 4.9×	333 0.5×	362 0.9×	331 0.9×	144	6.6k
Sha Tao China	28	642 0.4×	736 0.7×	304 0.4×	64 0.2×	36 0.1×	129	3.0k
James E. Pustejovsky United States	31	965 0.6×	1.6k 1.5×	275 0.4×	62 0.2×	22 0.1×	76	4.2k
Keith Allan Australia	27	227 0.1×	303 0.3×	815 1.1×	449 1.1×	1.4k 3.7×	106	3.5k
Richard Parker United States	32	2.4k 1.6×	3.8k 3.7×	217 0.3×	78 0.2×	148 0.4×	94	5.8k
Jonathan D. Nelson United States	25	1.0k 0.7×	355 0.3×	322 0.4×	269 0.7×	16 0.0×	48	2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by John Hoeks

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hoeks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hoeks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hoeks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hoeks

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hoeks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hoeks. The network helps show where John Hoeks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Hoeks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Hoeks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Hoeks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Hoeks. John Hoeks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Graça, João, et al.. (2025). Defensive reactions to a meat reduction intervention. Appetite. 217. 108354–108354.

Fuller, Janet M., et al.. (2023). Embedding animals within a definition of sustainability. Sustainability Science. 18(4). 1925–1938. 5 indexed citations

Ongena, Yfke, et al.. (2023). Explaining vegetarian and vegan dietary behavior among U.S. and Dutch samples applying a reasoned action approach. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7. 2 indexed citations

Hoeks, John, Sophie Spoorenberg, Sijmen A. Reijneveld, et al.. (2019). Using Photo Stories to Support Doctor-Patient Communication: Evaluating a Communicative Health Literacy Intervention for Older Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16(19). 3726–3726. 7 indexed citations

Frank, Stefan L. & John Hoeks. (2019). The interaction between structure and meaning in sentence comprehension: Recurrent neural networks and reading times. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 10 indexed citations

Hoeks, John, et al.. (2019). “Hey, that could be me”: The role of similarity in narrative persuasion. PLoS ONE. 14(4). e0215359–e0215359. 36 indexed citations

Jansen, Carel, et al.. (2017). Health Communication| “Don’t Make My Mistake”: On the Processing of Narrative Fear Appeals. International journal of communication. 11. 22. 2 indexed citations

Stowe, Laurie A., et al.. (2015). When Correction Turns Positive: Processing Corrective Prosody in Dutch. PLoS ONE. 10(5). e0126299–e0126299. 3 indexed citations

Brouwer, Harm & John Hoeks. (2013). A time and place for language comprehension: mapping the N400 and the P600 to a minimal cortical network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7. 758–758. 100 indexed citations

10.

Hoeks, John, Laurie A. Stowe, Petra Hendriks, & Harm Brouwer. (2013). Questions Left Unanswered: How the Brain Responds to Missing Information. PLoS ONE. 8(10). e73594–e73594. 10 indexed citations

11.

Brouwer, Harm, Hartmut Fitz, & John Hoeks. (2010). Modeling the Noun Phrase versus Sentence Coordination Ambiguity in Dutch: Evidence from Surprisal Theory. Max Planck Digital Library. 72–80. 17 indexed citations

12.

Stowe, Laurie A., et al.. (2010). Focus particles and prosody processing in Dutch: evidence from ERPs. paper 979–0. 20 indexed citations

13.

Stowe, Laurie A., et al.. (2010). ERP correlates of focus accentuation in Dutch. paper 873–0. 21 indexed citations

14.

Hoeks, John, Gisela Redeker, & Petra Hendriks. (2009). Fill the Gap! Combining Pragmatic and Prosodic Information to Make Gapping Easy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 38(3). 221–235. 10 indexed citations

15.

Redeker, Gisela, et al.. (2008). Prosodic correlates of linguistic and extra-linguistic information in Dutch. Cognitive Science. 2191–2196. 1 indexed citations

16.

Redeker, Gisela, et al.. (2008). Linguistic and extra-linguistic determinants of accentuation in dutch. 409–412. 20 indexed citations

17.

Hoeks, John, et al.. (2006). The predominance of nonstructural factors in the processing of gapping sentences. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 28(28). 1511–1516. 3 indexed citations

18.

Hoeks, John, et al.. (2005). Time is of the Essence: Processing Temporal Connectives During Reading. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26). 577–582. 6 indexed citations

19.

Hoeks, John, et al.. (2005). Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Conference Cognitive Science. 231 indexed citations

20.

Hoeks, John, et al.. (2004). Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research. 19(1). 59–73. 276 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact