Countries citing papers authored by Matthew W. Crocker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew W. Crocker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew W. Crocker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew W. Crocker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew W. Crocker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew W. Crocker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew W. Crocker. The network helps show where Matthew W. Crocker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew W. Crocker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew W. Crocker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew W. Crocker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew W. Crocker. Matthew W. Crocker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Drenhaus, Heiner, et al.. (2017). Information density of encodings: The role of syntactic variation in comprehension.. Cognitive Science.6 indexed citations
6.
Gambi, Chiara & Matthew W. Crocker. (2017). How do speakers coordinate planning and articulation? Evidence from gaze-speech lags. Cognitive Science.
7.
Koller, Alexander, et al.. (2012). Enhancing Referential Success by Tracking Hearer Gaze. Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 30–39.18 indexed citations
8.
Staudte, Maria, et al.. (2012). Using listener gaze to augment speech generation in a virtual 3D environment. Cognitive Science. 34(34).7 indexed citations
9.
Crocker, Matthew W., et al.. (2011). The Interplay of Multiple Mechanisms in Word Learning. Cognitive Science. 33(33).5 indexed citations
10.
Farkaš, Igor, et al.. (2011). Modeling Utterance-mediated Attention in Situated Language Comprehension. Cognitive Science. 33(33).
11.
Crocker, Matthew W., et al.. (2010). Sentence Processing Mechanisms Influence Cross-Situational Word Learning. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32).4 indexed citations
12.
Crocker, Matthew W. & Maria Staudte. (2009). The effect of robot gaze on processing robot utterances. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31).14 indexed citations
Crocker, Matthew W. & Igor Farkaš. (2006). Recurrent Networks and Natural Language: Exploiting Self-organization. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).4 indexed citations
Padó, Ulrike, Matthew W. Crocker, & Frank Keller. (2006). Modelling Semantic Role Pausibility in Human Sentence Processing.. Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.5 indexed citations
17.
Crocker, Matthew W., et al.. (2005). A Connectionist Model of Sentence Comprehension in Visual Worlds. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27). 1442.4 indexed citations
18.
Crocker, Matthew W., et al.. (2004). Generating Semantic Graphs through Self-Organization.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 44–49.3 indexed citations
19.
Knoeferle, Pia, Matthew W. Crocker, Christoph Scheepers, & Martin J. Pickering. (2003). Actions and roles: Using depicted events for disambiguation and reinterpretation in German and English. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 25(25). 686.2 indexed citations
20.
Crocker, Matthew W.. (1991). Multiple Meta-Interpreters in a Logical Model of Sentence Processing.. 91(12). 127–145.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.