I.M. Krämer

1.1k total citations
11 papers, 598 citations indexed

About

I.M. Krämer is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, I.M. Krämer has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 598 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Language and Linguistics, 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in I.M. Krämer's work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). I.M. Krämer is often cited by papers focused on Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). I.M. Krämer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and Germany. I.M. Krämer's co-authors include Joost Zwarts, Helen de Hoop, Petra Hendriks, Rineke Verbrugge, Jennifer Spenader, John Hoeks, H.E. de Swart, Huib E. de Swart and Henriëtte de Swart and has published in prestigious journals such as Lingua, Language Acquisition and Journal of Logic Language and Information.

In The Last Decade

I.M. Krämer

11 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
I.M. Krämer Netherlands	6	304	259	226	179	164	11	598
Theodora Alexopoulou United Kingdom	12	350 1.2×	323 1.2×	162 0.7×	109 0.6×	309 1.9×	26	685
Eric Reuland Netherlands	10	519 1.7×	176 0.7×	174 0.8×	195 1.1×	203 1.2×	48	702
Tom Roeper United States	12	255 0.8×	270 1.0×	182 0.8×	110 0.6×	119 0.7×	32	506
Gregory Scontras United States	12	427 1.4×	270 1.0×	208 0.9×	154 0.9×	212 1.3×	47	725
Dagmar Divjak United Kingdom	16	363 1.2×	147 0.6×	112 0.5×	237 1.3×	255 1.6×	54	630
Jennifer Spenader Netherlands	10	233 0.8×	225 0.9×	217 1.0×	145 0.8×	179 1.1×	49	532
Detlef Stark	7	459 1.5×	233 0.9×	75 0.3×	157 0.9×	219 1.3×	10	754
Valentine Hacquard United States	14	498 1.6×	256 1.0×	126 0.6×	240 1.3×	219 1.3×	39	788
Julien Musolino United States	16	617 2.0×	796 3.1×	395 1.7×	208 1.2×	277 1.7×	30	1.3k
Richard Towell United Kingdom	10	535 1.8×	408 1.6×	115 0.5×	154 0.9×	116 0.7×	26	749

Countries citing papers authored by I.M. Krämer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.M. Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.M. Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.M. Krämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.M. Krämer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.M. Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.M. Krämer. The network helps show where I.M. Krämer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I.M. Krämer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I.M. Krämer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I.M. Krämer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I.M. Krämer. I.M. Krämer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Hendriks, Petra, Helen de Hoop, I.M. Krämer, Henriëtte de Swart, & Joost Zwarts. (2010). Nominals with and without an article: distribution, interpretation and variation. 137–172. 1 indexed citations

2.

Hendriks, Petra, Helen de Hoop, I.M. Krämer, Huib E. de Swart, & Joost Zwarts. (2010). Conflicts in Interpretation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 25 indexed citations

3.

Hendriks, Petra, John Hoeks, Helen de Hoop, et al.. (2009). Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory. 122 indexed citations

4.

Verbrugge, Rineke, et al.. (2008). Children’s Application of Theory of Mind in Reasoning and Language. Journal of Logic Language and Information. 17(4). 417–442. 76 indexed citations

5.

Krämer, I.M., et al.. (2007). Cognitive foundations of interpretation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 268 indexed citations

6.

Krämer, I.M.. (2007). Language acquisition between sentence and discourse. Lingua. 117(11). 1833–1836. 2 indexed citations

7.

Hoop, Helen de & I.M. Krämer. (2006). Children's Optimal Interpretations of Indefinite Subjects and Objects. Language Acquisition. 13(2). 103–123. 53 indexed citations

8.

Krämer, I.M.. (2005). Quantification and learnability. Linguistics in the Netherlands. 22. 111–123. 2 indexed citations

9.

Krämer, I.M.. (2000). Interpreting indefinites: An experimental study of children's language comprehension. Max Planck Digital Library. 46 indexed citations

10.

Krämer, I.M.. (1999). Who are you talking about? Children's Interpretation of Sentence Initial Indefinite Subjects in Sentences Containing Negation. Linguistics in the Netherlands. 16. 121–134. 1 indexed citations

11.

Krämer, I.M.. (1998). Children's Interpretations of Indefinite Object Noun Phrases. Linguistics in the Netherlands. 15. 163–174. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact