I.M. Krämer

1.1k citations
11 papers · 598 indexed · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

I.M. Krämer

11 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

I.M. Krämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Language and Linguistics 304
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 259
  • Linguistics and Language 88
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 179
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 226
Replace Valentine Hacquard with:
Valentine Hacquard United States
Daniel Freudenthal United Kingdom
Carson T. Schütze United States
Julien Musolino United States
Theodora Alexopoulou United Kingdom
Neal Snider United States
Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul Netherlands
Jennifer Spenader Netherlands
Tom Roeper United States
Kristen Syrett United States
I.M. Krämer relative to Valentine Hacquard United States Valentine Hacquard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Valentine Hacquard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I.M. Krämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.M. Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.M. Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.M. Krämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.M. Krämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.M. Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.M. Krämer. The network helps show where I.M. Krämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside I.M. Krämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I.M. Krämer Line = papers co-authored together I.M. Krämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Cognitive foundations of interpretation
2007268
2
Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory
2009122
3 200876
4 200653
5 200046
6
Conflicts in Interpretation
201025
7 19982
8 20052
9 20072
10 20101
11 19991

About I.M. Krämer

I.M. Krämer is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Linguistics and Language, Cultural Studies and Statistics and Probability, having authored 11 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (1 paper) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (304 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (259 citations), Linguistics and Language (88 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (179 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (226 citations). I.M. Krämer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joost Zwarts, Helen de Hoop, Petra Hendriks, Rineke Verbrugge, John Hoeks, Jennifer Spenader, H.E. de Swart, Huib E. de Swart and Henriëtte de Swart. Their work appears in journals such as Linguistics in the Netherlands, Language Acquisition, Lingua, Journal of Logic Language and Information and Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026